Literature DB >> 12147926

Comparison of telmisartan vs. valsartan in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

George Bakris1.   

Abstract

A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point trial compared telmisartan and valsartan for treating mild to moderate hypertension. Efficacy for 24-hour control of blood pressure was assessed using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Mean changes in diastolic blood pressure for the last 6 hours before dosing and the nighttime period were significantly greater with telmisartan than with valsartan (p<0.01 for the last 6 hours before dosing; p<0.05 for the nighttime period). Mean changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressures for the 24-hour interval, the morning, and the daytime periods were significantly greater with telmisartan than with valsartan (p<0.01). The incidence of all adverse events and the most common adverse events were comparable for patients receiving telmisartan and patients receiving valsartan. Neither treatment was associated with cough. These data suggest greater efficacy for telmisartan than valsartan in controlling blood pressure throughout the 24-hour dosing interval, including the last 6 hours before dosing, and the two agents were similarly well tolerated. Copyright 2002 Le Jacq Communications, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12147926      PMCID: PMC8101901          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2002.01586.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  22 in total

1.  Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist: antihypertensive effects over 24 hours.

Authors:  J Neutel; M Weber; J Pool; D Smith; S Fitzsimmons; Y T Chiang; M Gatlin
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.393

2.  Prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) study. A novel design for intervention trials. Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-Point.

Authors:  L Hansson; T Hedner; B Dahlöf
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 3.  Angiotensin receptors and their antagonists.

Authors:  T L Goodfriend; M E Elliott; K J Catt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-06-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A comparison of the efficacies and duration of action of the angiotensin II receptor blockers telmisartan and amlodipine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 5.  Ambulatory blood pressure as a predictor of target organ disease and outcome in the hypertensive patient.

Authors:  W B White
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  1999 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 6.  Angiotensin-II-receptors: new targets for antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  M I Oliverio; T M Coffman
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  From the HOPE to the ONTARGET and the TRANSCEND studies: challenges in improving prognosis.

Authors:  Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  ABPM comparison of the antihypertensive profiles of the selective angiotensin II receptor antagonists telmisartan and losartan in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Authors:  J Mallion; J Siche; Y Lacourcière
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.012

9.  Circadian variation in the frequency of onset of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J E Muller; P H Stone; Z G Turi; J D Rutherford; C A Czeisler; C Parker; W K Poole; E Passamani; R Roberts; T Robertson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Angiotensin II receptor inhibition. A new therapeutic principle.

Authors:  F H Messerli; M A Weber; H R Brunner
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-09-23
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Telmisartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Anna J Battershill; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of telmisartan versus valsartan in the management of essential hypertension.

Authors:  Zhenfeng Zheng; Shan Lin; Huilan Shi
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Impact of telmisartan in modifying vascular risk.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Baguet; Olivier Ormezzano; Gilles Barone-Rochette
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2010-06-15

4.  Is the newest angiotensin-receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil more efficacious in lowering blood pressure than the older ones? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ji-Guang Wang; Miao Zhang; Ying-Qing Feng; Chang-Sheng Ma; Tzung-Dau Wang; Zhi-Ming Zhu; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.