Literature DB >> 11019834

Individualizing high-dose oral busulfan: prospective dose adjustment in a pediatric population undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation for advanced hematologic malignancies.

H T Tran1, T Madden, D Petropoulos, L L Worth, E A Felix, H A Sprigg-Saenz, M Choroszy, M Danielson, D Przepiorka, K W Chan.   

Abstract

We investigated whether adjusting the oral busulfan (BU) dosage on the basis of early pharmacokinetic data to achieve a targeted drug exposure could reduce transplant-related complications in children with advanced hematologic malignancies. Twenty-five children received a preparative regimen consisting of thiotepa (250 mg/m2 i.v. daily for 3 days), BU (40 mg/m2 per dose p.o. every 6 h for 12 doses), and cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg i.v. daily for 2 days) and then underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Busulfan clearance and area under concentration time-curve (AUC) were determined after the first dose using a one-compartment pharmacokinetic (PK) model with first-order absorption. The initial PK analysis was successfully completed after the first BU dose in 21 patients (84%). A final AUC of 1000-1500 microM x min/dose was targeted and subsequent doses were modified as necessary to achieve this value. Fourteen of the 25 patients (56%) required dose adjustment. Follow-up PK analysis was completed in 21 patients and 16 of these achieved the targeted BU exposure for the course of therapy. Interpatient variability in BU clearance was high (up to five-fold). The most frequent regimen-related toxicities were cutaneous and gastrointestinal (stomatitis and diarrhea). Only one patient developed hepatic veno-occlusive disease. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of adjusting the oral BU dose in individual pediatric patients. Although toxicity associated with BU seemed to be reduced, this conclusion is tempered by the fact that the overall regimen-related toxicity (RRT) remains substantial and reflected the effects of all agents used in the preparative regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11019834     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  11 in total

Review 1.  Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review.

Authors:  Milly E de Jonge; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Monitoring of Busulphan Concentrations in Children Undergone Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Unicentric Experience over 10 years.

Authors:  Maura Faraci; Carmine Tinelli; Edoardo Lanino; Stefano Giardino; Massimiliano Leoni; Marta Ferretti; Elio Castagnola; Monica Broglia; Annalisa De Silvestri; Daniela Di Martino; Antonella Bartoli
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.441

3.  Pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan in children prior to stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Serge Cremers; Rik Schoemaker; Robbert Bredius; Jan den Hartigh; Lynne Ball; Irene Twiss; Pieter Vermeij; Jaak Vossen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Should busulfan therapeutic range be narrowed in pediatrics? Experience from a large cohort of hematopoietic stem cell transplant children.

Authors:  M Philippe; S Goutelle; J Guitton; X Fonrose; C Bergeron; P Girard; Y Bertrand; N Bleyzac
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Variability in the pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulphan given as a single daily dose to paediatric blood or marrow transplant recipients.

Authors:  Christa E Nath; John W Earl; Nalini Pati; Katherine Stephen; Peter J Shaw
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  The development of a myeloablative, reduced-toxicity, conditioning regimen for cord blood transplantation.

Authors:  Rohtesh S Mehta; Antonio Di Stasi; Borje S Andersson; Yago Nieto; Roy Jones; Marcos de Lima; Chitra Hosing; Uday Popat; Partow Kebriaei; Betul Oran; Amin Alousi; Katayoun Rezvani; Muzaffar Qazilbash; Qaiser Bashir; Catherine Bollard; Laurence Cooper; Laura Worth; Priti Tewari; Ian McNiece; Kaci Willhelm; Richard Champlin; Elizabeth J Shpall
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2013-10-26

7.  Allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for adults AML using i.v. BU in the conditioning regimen: outcomes and risk factors for the occurrence of hepatic sinusoidal obstructive syndrome.

Authors:  A Nagler; M Labopin; R Berger; D Bunjes; A Campos; G Socié; N Kröger; H Goker; I Yakoub-Agha; A Shimoni; M Mohty; V Rocha
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  Busulfan Pharmacokinetics in Adenosine Deaminase-Deficient Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Gene Therapy.

Authors:  Kathryn L Bradford; Siyu Liu; Maja Krajinovic; Marc Ansari; Elizabeth Garabedian; John Tse; Xiaoyan Wang; Kit L Shaw; H Bobby Gaspar; Fabio Candotti; Donald B Kohn
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Clarifying busulfan metabolism and drug interactions to support new therapeutic drug monitoring strategies: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Alan L Myers; Jitesh D Kawedia; Richard E Champlin; Mark A Kramer; Yago Nieto; Romi Ghose; Borje S Andersson
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 10.  Busulfan systemic exposure and its relationship with efficacy and safety in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinying Feng; Yunjiao Wu; Jingru Zhang; Jiapeng Li; Guanghua Zhu; Duanfang Fan; Changqing Yang; Libo Zhao
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.