| Literature DB >> 24169268 |
Rohtesh S Mehta1, Antonio Di Stasi2, Borje S Andersson2, Yago Nieto2, Roy Jones2, Marcos de Lima3, Chitra Hosing2, Uday Popat2, Partow Kebriaei2, Betul Oran2, Amin Alousi2, Katayoun Rezvani2, Muzaffar Qazilbash2, Qaiser Bashir2, Catherine Bollard4, Laurence Cooper2, Laura Worth2, Priti Tewari2, Ian McNiece2, Kaci Willhelm2, Richard Champlin2, Elizabeth J Shpall2.
Abstract
Cord blood transplantation is being used with increasing frequency for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. Myeloablative preparative regimens provide antitumor efficacy and facilitate engraftment but are associated with higher morbidity and nonrelapse mortality rates than nonablative regimens. We evaluated 3 sequential myeloablative regimens in the cord blood transplant setting. Regimen 1 (melphalan, fludarabine, and thiotepa) produced prompt engraftment and minimal engraftment failure but was associated with a high nonrelapse mortality rate. Regimen 2 (busulfan and fludarabine) was very well tolerated but was associated with a high rate of engraftment failure and relapse. Regimen 3 (busulfan, clofarabine, fludarabine, and low-dose total body irradiation given 9 days after the chemotherapy) was associated with a low rate of engraftment failure but was logistically difficult to administer. Finally, regimen 3 that included the total body irradiation given immediately after the chemotherapy was well tolerated, with prompt engraftment and tumor control. This latter regimen appears to be effective in preliminary studies and warrants further evaluation.Entities:
Keywords: Conditioning regimen; Hematologic malignancies; Stem cell transplant; Total body irradiation; Treatment related mortality
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24169268 PMCID: PMC3913126 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2013.08.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ISSN: 2152-2669