Literature DB >> 11019625

Effects of subphonetic and syllable structure variation on word recognition.

J A Utman1, S E Blumstein, M W Burton.   

Abstract

This study explored whether natural acoustic variations as exemplified by either subphonetic changes or syllable structure changes affect word recognition processes. Subphonetic variations were realized by differences in the voice-onset time (VOT) value of initial voiceless stop consonants, and syllable structure variations were realized by vowel deletion in initial unstressed syllables in multisyllable words. An auditory identity priming paradigm was used to determine whether the amount of facilitation obtained to a target stimulus in a lexical decision task was affected by the presence of these acoustic variations in a prime stimulus. Results revealed different patterns for the two types of variability as a function of lexical status. In the case of subphonetic variations, shortening of VOT resulted in reduced facilitation for words but not for nonwords, whereas in the case of syllable structure variation, vowel deletion in an unstressed syllable resulted in reduced facilitation for nonwords and increased facilitation for words. These findings indicate that subphonetic variability interferes with word recognition, whereas syllable structure variability does not, and that this effect is independent of the magnitude of the acoustic difference between a citation form and its variant. Furthermore, the results suggest that the lexical status of the target item plays a crucial role in the processing of both types of variability. Results are considered in relation to current models of word recognition.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11019625     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  11 in total

1.  Individual differences in language ability are related to variation in word recognition, not speech perception: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Cheyenne Munson; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Evaluating the sources and functions of gradiency in phoneme categorization: An individual differences approach.

Authors:  Efthymia C Kapnoula; Matthew B Winn; Eun Jong Kong; Jan Edwards; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Speech categorization develops slowly through adolescence.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ani Danelz; Hannah Rigler; Michael Seedorff
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2018-06-28

4.  Semantic context effects in the comprehension of reduced pronunciation variants.

Authors:  Marco van de Ven; Benjamin V Tucker; Mirjam Ernestus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

Review 5.  Dimension-selective attention as a possible driver of dynamic, context-dependent re-weighting in speech processing.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Adam T Tierney; Giada Guerra; Aeron Laffere; Frederic Dick
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Native-language benefit for understanding speech-in-noise: The contribution of semantics.

Authors:  Narly Golestani; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2009-07

7.  What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.

Authors:  Marcus E Galle; Jamie Klein-Packard; Kayleen Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01

8.  Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Richard N Aslin; Michael K Tanenhaus; Michael J Spivey; Dana Subik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Within-category VOT affects recovery from "lexical" garden paths: Evidence against phoneme-level inhibition.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Infant directed speech and the development of speech perception: enhancing development or an unintended consequence?

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Kristine A Kovack-Lesh; Dresden Goodwin; William McEchron
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-08-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.