Literature DB >> 11014427

Computer-assisted fluoroscopic targeting system for pedicle screw insertion.

W W Choi1, B A Green, A D Levi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Biplanar fluoroscopic imaging linked to a computer-driven mechanical end-effector is under development as a targeting system for spinal surgery. This technology has the potential to enhance standard intraoperative fluoroscopic information for localization of the pedicle entry point and trajectory, and it may be an effective alternative to the computed tomography-based image-guided system (IGS) in pedicle screw placement. A preclinical study to assess the accuracy and time efficiency of this system versus a conventional IGS was conducted.
METHODS: Pedicle screw placement was performed in six cadavers from T1 to S1 levels using the ViewPoint IGS (Picker International, Inc., Cleveland, OH) on one side versus the Fluorotactic guidance system (Z-Kat, Inc., Miami, FL) on the other side. Of 216 possible pedicles, 208 were instrumented; 8 pedicle diameters were too small or were not adequately imaged. Postinsertion, each pedicle was assessed for the presence and location of cortical perforation using computed tomographic scanning and direct visualization.
RESULTS: The number of successful screw placements was 89 (87.3%) of 102 for IGS and 87 (82.1 %) of 106 for the Fluorotactic guidance system, respectively. The mean time to register and operate on one level using the Fluorotactic guidance system was 14:34 minutes (minutes:seconds), compared with 6:50 minutes using the IGS. The average fluoroscope time was 4.6 seconds per pedicle.
CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that this first-generation fluoroscopy-based targeting system can significantly assist the surgeon in pedicle screw placement. The overall accuracy is comparable to an IGS, especially in the region of T9-L5. A second-generation system with a faster end-effector and user-friendly interface should significantly reduce the operating and fluoroscope time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11014427     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200010000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  19 in total

1.  Device setting modifications for 3D flatpanel imaging in skull base surgery.

Authors:  Frederike Hassepass; Wolfgang Maier; Antje Aschendorff; Stefan Bulla; Werner Vach; Roland Laszig; Tanja D Grauvogel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Qi-Shan Huang; Ping Zhou; Yang Zhou; Rui-Kai Wu; Yi Lou; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  CT accuracy of percutaneous versus open pedicle screw techniques: a series of 1609 screws.

Authors:  Todd M Chapman; Daniel J Blizzard; Christopher R Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques.

Authors:  J Silbermann; F Riese; Y Allam; T Reichert; H Koeppert; M Gutberlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine: comparison between free hand and a generic 3D-based navigation techniques.

Authors:  Yasser Allam; J Silbermann; F Riese; R Greiner-Perth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent patients with severe spinal deformities: a retrospective study comparing drill guide template with free-hand technique.

Authors:  Yue Pan; G H Lü; Lei Kuang; Bing Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Inserting pedicle screws in the upper thoracic spine without the use of fluoroscopy or image guidance. Is it safe?

Authors:  Constantin Schizas; Nicolas Theumann; Victor Kosmopoulos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Minimally Invasive, Stereotactic, Wireless, Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbar Spine: Accuracy Rates With 182 Consecutive Screws.

Authors:  Saeed S Sadrameli; Ryan Jafrani; Blake N Staub; Majdi Radaideh; Paul J Holman
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12-21

10.  Accuracy and Safety in Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spines : Comparison Study between Conventional C-Arm Fluoroscopy and Navigation Coupled with O-Arm® Guided Methods.

Authors:  Myung-Hoon Shin; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.