Literature DB >> 11013493

Impact response of the intervertebral disc in a finite-element model.

C K Lee1, Y E Kim, C S Lee, Y M Hong, J M Jung, V K Goel.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A three-dimensional nonlinear poroelastic finite-element model of a vertebra disc was used to analyze the biomechanical effects of impact loading on the spinal segment.
OBJECTIVES: To predict changes in biomechanical parameters such as intradiscal pressure, dynamic stiffness, stresses in the endplate region, and the shock-absorbing mechanism of the spine under different impact duration/loading rates, and to investigate the relation between the rate of loading and the fracture potential of the vertebral body. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It is not practical to discern the role of impact duration using experimental protocols. Analytical studies are better suited to this purpose. However, previous poroelastic finite-element models of the motion segments have dealt mostly with creep phenomena.
METHODS: A three-dimensional, L3-L4 motion-segment, finite-element model was modified to incorporate the poroelastic properties of the disc, endplate, and cancellous core, and thus simulate the shock-absorbing phenomena. The results were analyzed under variable impact durations for a constant maximum compressive impact load of 3 kN.
RESULTS: For a shorter impact duration and a given F(max), relatively high cancellous core pressure was generated as compared with a case of long impact duration, although the amount of impulse was increased. In contrast, relatively constant pore pressures were generated in the nucleus regardless of the impact duration. The changes in spinal segment stiffness as a function of impact duration indicated that for a shorter duration of impact, high dynamic stiffness increases the stability of the spinal segment against the impact load. However, the corresponding increase in stresses within the vertebral body and endplate may produce fractures.
CONCLUSIONS: The finite-element technique was used to address the role of impact duration in producing trauma to the spinal motion segment. Within the limitations of the model, the results suggest that fractures are likely to occur under shorter impact duration conditions. Depending on the strength of the region, a fracture may be initiated in the endplate region or the posterior wall of the cortical shell. The nucleus pressure is independent of the impact duration and depends only on the magnitude of the impact force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11013493     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200010010-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

1.  Inclusion of regional poroelastic material properties better predicts biomechanical behavior of lumbar discs subjected to dynamic loading.

Authors:  Jamie R Williams; Raghu N Natarajan; Gunnar B J Andersson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Human L3L4 intervertebral disc mean 3D shape, modes of variation, and their relationship to degeneration.

Authors:  John M Peloquin; Jonathon H Yoder; Nathan T Jacobs; Sung M Moon; Alexander C Wright; Edward J Vresilovic; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Treatment of thoracolumbar fracture with pedicle screws at injury level: a biomechanical study based on three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Qin-liang Li; Xiu-zhong Li; Yi Liu; Hu-sheng Zhang; Peng Shang; Zhao-ming Chu; Jin-chuan Chen; Ming Chen; Rujie Qin
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-09-19

4.  The degenerative state of the intervertebral disk independently predicts the failure of human lumbar spine to high rate loading: an experimental study.

Authors:  Ron Noah Alkalay; David Vader; David Hackney
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Material properties in unconfined compression of human nucleus pulposus, injectable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels and tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Neil R Malhotra; Lihui Weng; Weiliam Chen; Robert L Mauck; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Differences in endplate deformation of the adjacent and augmented vertebra following cement augmentation.

Authors:  Paul A Hulme; S K Boyd; P F Heini; S J Ferguson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Intralaminar C7 Screw Constructs with and without Offset Connector Used for C6-7 Cervical Spine Immobilization : A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Muhammad Qasim; Jae Taek Hong; Raghu N Natarajan; Howard S An
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-06-30

8.  FEM Simulation of Non-Progressive Growth from Asymmetric Loading and Vicious Cycle Theory: Scoliosis Study Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Jonathan Fok; Samer Adeeb; Jason Carey
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2010-08-17

9.  Biomechanical analysis of the lumbar spine on facet joint force and intradiscal pressure--a finite element study.

Authors:  Ching-Sung Kuo; Hsuan-Teh Hu; Ruey-Mo Lin; Kuo-Yuan Huang; Po-Chun Lin; Zheng-Cheng Zhong; Mu-Lin Hseih
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  A biomechanical comparison of three different posterior fixation constructs used for c6-c7 cervical spine immobilization: a finite element study.

Authors:  Jae Taek Hong; Muhammad Qasim; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Raghu N Natarajan; Howard S An
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.