Literature DB >> 11007387

Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

A K Alderman1, E G Wilkins, J C Lowery, M Kim, J A Davis.   

Abstract

In today's increasingly competitive health care marketplace, consumer satisfaction has become an important measure of quality. Furthermore, measures of satisfaction with treatment inteerventions are influential factors in determining patients' and payers' choices of health care. This study sought to evaluate satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction and to assess the effects of procedure type and timing on patient satisfaction. As part of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study, patients undergoing first-time mastectomy reconstruction were prospectively evaluated, including cohorts of women choosing expander/implant, pedicle TRFAM flap, and free TRAM flap procedures. Preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, participants completed a questionnaire that collected a variety of health status information. The postoperative questionnaire had an additional seven items assessing both general satisfaction with reconstruction (five items) and aesthetic satisfaction (two items) as separate subscales. Patients were asked to respond to each item using a five-point Likert scale. Item responses ranged from 1, indicating high satisfaction, to 5, reflecting low satisfaction. In the data analysis, only patients responding with a 1 or 2 for all of the items within a subscale were classified as "satisfied" for the subscale. To assess the effects of procedure type (implant, pedicle TRAM flap, and free TRAM flap) and timing (immediate versus delayed) on satisfaction and to control for possible confounding effects from other independent variables, multiple logistic regression was employed. In our analysis, odds ratios and associated 95 percent confidence intervals were calculated for each independent variable in the regression. Statistical significance was designated at the p < or = 0.05 level. A total of 212 patients were followed during the period of 1994 to 1997, including 141 immediate and 71 delayed reconstructions. The study population consisted of 49 expander/implant, 102 pedicle TRAM flap, and 61 free TRAM flap reconstruction patients. The analysis showed a significant association between procedure type and patient satisfaction. TRAM flap patients (both free and pedicle) appeared to have significantly greater general and aesthetic satisfaction compared with expander/implant patients (p = 0.03 and 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, pedicle TRAM flap patients were more aesthetically satisfied than those with free TRAM flaps (p = 0.072). The other independent variables of age and procedure timing did not appear to significantly affect either general or aesthetic satisfaction. However, preoperative physical activity was positively correlated with general satisfaction at the p = 0.034 level. The choice of procedure seems to have a significant effect on both aesthetic and general patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. In this study, autogenous tissue reconstructions produced higher levels of patient aesthetic and general satisfaction compared with implant techniques. Pedicle and free TRAM flap patients do not seem to differ significantly in general satisfaction. However, women receiving pedicle TRAM flaps reported greater aesthetic satisfaction compared with patients undergoing free TRAM flaps. Furthermore, patient age and procedure timing may not have an effect on patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11007387     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200009040-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  61 in total

1.  Breast reconstruction in private practice.

Authors:  Steven M Pisano; Peter R Ledoux; Chet L Nastala
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Impact of Unilateral versus Bilateral Breast Reconstruction on Procedure Choices and Outcomes.

Authors:  Erin M Taylor; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic; Ji Qi; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Gretchen E Guldbrandsen; Yoon S Chun
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  [Quality of life and patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction].

Authors:  N A Papadopulos; L Kovacs; A Baumann; S Ali; P Herschbach; G Henrich; E Biemer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Does "Two is Better Than One" Apply to Surgeons? Comparing Single-Surgeon Versus Co-surgeon Bilateral Mastectomies.

Authors:  Melissa Anne Mallory; Katya Losk; Kristen Camuso; Stephanie Caterson; Suniti Nimbkar; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Influence of health insurance, hospital factors and physician volume on receipt of immediate post-mastectomy reconstruction in women with invasive and non-invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  D L Hershman; C A Richards; K Kalinsky; E T Wilde; Y S Lu; J A Ascherman; A I Neugut; J D Wright
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  The impact of breast reconstruction on the delivery of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; E Dale Collins; Anne Schott; Melissa E Hughes; Rebecca A Ottesen; Richard L Theriault; Yu-Ning Wong; Jane C Weeks; Joyce C Niland; Stephen B Edge
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Developing a theoretical framework to illustrate associations among patient satisfaction, body image and quality of life for women undergoing breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Summer W Nipomnick; Melissa A Crosby; Gregory P Reece
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.111

8.  Evaluation of Long-Term Satisfaction with Breast Surgery in Patients Treated for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Population-Based Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Devon Livingston-Rosanoff; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Polly A Newcomb; Lee G Wilke
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015.

Authors:  Wess A Cohen; Lily R Mundy; Tiffany N S Ballard; Anne Klassen; Stefan J Cano; John Browne; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Financial impact of breast reconstruction on an academic surgical practice.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Amy F Storey; Nita S Nair; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.