Literature DB >> 16437226

[Quality of life and patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction].

N A Papadopulos1, L Kovacs, A Baumann, S Ali, P Herschbach, G Henrich, E Biemer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, the array of methods for reconstruction of the female breast following mastectomy is vast. In this study, we investigate and compare quality of life after breast reconstruction and satisfaction with the results of two commonly used techniques (autologous tissue vs. expander/implant).
METHODS: Ninety-one consecutive patients who underwent breast reconstruction at a German clinic between 1996 and 2001 were included in the study. Patient satisfaction and quality of life were assessed retrospectively using self-evaluation questionnaires.
RESULTS: Patients were generally more satisfied with the outcome of the operation when autologous tissue was used. This was significant in the following areas: breast size, form, definition of the lower breast fold, softness of the breast, and symmetry of the breasts. In both groups the quality of life following breast reconstruction at least 2 years after the operation was equal to that of healthy women of the same age group.
CONCLUSION: Although patients were more satisfied with the results of autologous breast reconstruction, procedure choice did not affect quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16437226     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-005-1147-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  19 in total

1.  [Aspects of quality assurance in plastic surgery. Subjective well-being and satisfaction of 420 plastic surgery patients with preoperative counseling, surgical intervention and after-care].

Authors:  P Galanakis; E Biemer
Journal:  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.018

Review 2.  Breast cancer. Making the diagnosis.

Authors:  S Scott; M Morrow
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Comparison of resource costs between implant-based and TRAM flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S S Kroll; G R Evans; G P Reece; M J Miller; G Robb; B J Baldwin; M A Schusterman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Postmastectomy breast reconstruction: current techniques.

Authors:  A R Shons; G Mosiello
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.302

5.  Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction.

Authors:  W N Andrade; N Baxter; J L Semple
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  The transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous free flap: a reliable alternative for delayed autologous tissue breast reconstruction.

Authors:  A M Feller; H W Hörl; E Biemer
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Clinical outcome and patients' satisfaction after simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction with free transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap.

Authors:  Laszlo Kovacs; Nikolaos A Papadopulos; Samir A Ammar; Markus Klöppel; Peter Herschbach; Garhard Heinrich; Andreas Baumann; Edgar Biemer
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Postmastectomy reconstruction: comparative analysis of the psychosocial, functional, and cosmetic effects of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap versus breast implant reconstruction.

Authors:  P S Cederna; W R Yates; P Chang; A E Cram; E J Ricciardelli
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 9.  Reconstruction after mastectomy.

Authors:  R T Osteen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  The fate of breast implants: a critical analysis of complications and outcomes.

Authors:  N Handel; J A Jensen; Q Black; J R Waisman; M J Silverstein
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  2 in total

1.  Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue following mastectomy.

Authors:  Hr Teymouri; S Stergioula; M Eder; L Kovacs; E Biemer; Na Papadopulos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstructive surgery: A prospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Salem Mohammad Alshammari; Mohammed Yousef Aldossary; Khaled Almutairi; Abdulaziz Almulhim; Gousay Alkhazmari; Mohammed Alyaqout; Hussain Abrar
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-02-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.