Literature DB >> 11001516

Analysis of muscle coordination strategies in cycling.

B I Prilutsky1, R J Gregory.   

Abstract

The functional significance of the stereotypical muscle activation patterns used in skilled multi-joint tasks is not well understood. Optimization methods could provide insight into the functional significance of muscle coordination. The purpose of this study was to predict muscle force patterns during cycling by pushing and pulling the pedal using different optimization criteria and compare the predictions with electromyographic (EMG) patterns. To address the purpose of the study, 1) the contribution of muscle length and velocity changes to EMG-muscle force relationships during cycling was examined by comparing joint moments calculated from EMG and inverse dynamics, 2) patterns of individual muscle forces during cycling of five subjects were predicted using 13 different optimization criteria, and 3) the properties of the criterion with the best performance in predicting the normalized EMG were used to explain the features and functional significance of muscle coordination in cycling. It was shown that the criterion that minimizes the sum of muscle stresses cubed demonstrated the best performance in predicting the relative magnitude and patterns of muscle activation. Based on this criterion, it was suggested that the functional significance of muscle coordination strategy in cycling may be minimization of fatigue and/or perceived effort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11001516     DOI: 10.1109/86.867878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1063-6528


  14 in total

Review 1.  Optimization-based models of muscle coordination.

Authors:  Boris I Prilutsky; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  Role of optimization criterion in static asymmetric analysis of lumbar spine load.

Authors:  Matej Daniel
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-07-29

3.  Foot force direction in an isometric pushing task: prediction by kinematic and musculoskeletal models.

Authors:  M W Schmidt; C López-Ortiz; P S Barrett; L M Rogers; K G Gruben
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Analytical and numerical analysis of inverse optimization problems: conditions of uniqueness and computational methods.

Authors:  Alexander V Terekhov; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Motor adaptation to prosthetic cycling in people with trans-tibial amputation.

Authors:  W Lee Childers; Boris I Prilutsky; Robert J Gregor
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Changes in muscle activity and kinematics of highly trained cyclists during fatigue.

Authors:  Jonathan B Dingwell; Jason E Joubert; Fernando Diefenthaeler; Joel D Trinity
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  An analytical approach to the problem of inverse optimization with additive objective functions: an application to human prehension.

Authors:  Alexander V Terekhov; Yakov B Pesin; Xun Niu; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Short-term creatine supplementation does not improve muscle activation or sprint performance in humans.

Authors:  Ryuta Kinugasa; Hiroshi Akima; Akemi Ota; Atsutane Ohta; Katsumi Sugiura; Shin-Ya Kuno
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Task-dependent inhibition of slow-twitch soleus and excitation of fast-twitch gastrocnemius do not require high movement speed and velocity-dependent sensory feedback.

Authors:  Ricky Mehta; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Slow-time changes in human EMG muscle fatigue states are fully represented in movement kinematics.

Authors:  Miao Song; David B Segala; Jonathan B Dingwell; David Chelidze
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.899

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.