Literature DB >> 10999794

Skeletal benefits of alendronate: 7-year treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study Group.

R P Tonino1, P J Meunier, R Emkey, J A Rodriguez-Portales, C J Menkes, R D Wasnich, H G Bone, A C Santora, M Wu, R Desai, P D Ross.   

Abstract

We report here the second 2-yr extension of a clinical trial among postmenopausal women; 235 women continued blinded treatment with 5 or 10 mg alendronate daily, and 115 women who had been treated with alendronate for 5 yr were switched to blinded placebo. Continuous treatment with alendronate (10 mg daily) for 7 yr increased lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) by 11.4% compared to baseline. After the initial 18 months, each additional year of treatment through yr 7 increased spine BMD by 0.8% for the 10-mg dose and 0.6% for the 5-mg dose, with significant increases during yr 6-7. Previously reported increases in BMD at other skeletal sites and decreases in biochemical markers of bone turnover remained stable during yr 6-7. Among women previously taking alendronate for 5 yr who were switched to placebo, there was no significant decline in BMD at the spine or hip, whereas small, but significant, decreases in BMD at the forearm and total body and small increases in biochemical markers were observed. The safety and tolerability profiles were similar to those of placebo. This is the largest published long-term study of antiresorptive therapy. Our findings indicate that long-term alendronate treatment is well tolerated and effective for 7 yr. Increases in spinal BMD continue for at least 7 yr, and other skeletal benefits are maintained. Discontinuation does not lead to accelerated bone loss, but continuous treatment yields better skeletal benefits than shorter treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10999794     DOI: 10.1210/jcem.85.9.6777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  82 in total

1.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss.

Authors:  A I A Rahmy; T Gosens; G M Blake; A Tonino; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Three-year effectiveness of intravenous pamidronate versus pamidronate plus slow-release sodium fluoride for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  N Morabito; A Gaudio; A Lasco; C Vergara; F Tallarida; G Crisafulli; A Trifiletti; M Cincotta; M A Pizzoleo; N Frisina
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  An update on bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Stanley B Cohen
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 4.  Bisphosphonates in osteoporosis.

Authors:  H Fleisch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Bone quality: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Adherence, preference, and satisfaction of postmenopausal women taking denosumab or alendronate.

Authors:  D L Kendler; M R McClung; N Freemantle; M Lillestol; A H Moffett; J Borenstein; S Satram-Hoang; Y-C Yang; P Kaur; D Macarios; S Siddhanti
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Alendronate and risedronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: clinical profiles of the once-weekly and once-daily dosing formulations.

Authors:  Ronald Emkey
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-07-19

8.  Canadian Consensus Conference on osteoporosis, 2006 update.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Michel Fortier; Heather Frame; André Lalonde; Alexandra Papaioannou; Vyta Senikas; Chui Kin Yuen
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2006-02

9.  Cost effectiveness of raloxifene in the treatment of osteoporosis in Sweden: an economic evaluation based on the MORE study.

Authors:  Fredrik Borgström; Olof Johnell; John A Kanis; Anders Oden; David Sykes; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve quality of osteoporosis care after wrist fracture.

Authors:  S R Majumdar; D A Lier; B H Rowe; A S Russell; F A McAlister; W P Maksymowych; D A Hanley; D W Morrish; J A Johnson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.