Literature DB >> 8095636

Prevention of colorectal cancer by once-only sigmoidoscopy.

W S Atkin1, J Cuzick, J M Northover, D K Whynes.   

Abstract

There is no national screening programme for colorectal cancer in the UK despite the fact that the annual death toll from this disease exceeds that of breast and cervical cancer. Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is under evaluation for screening, but screening by sigmoidoscopy is not considered viable. This situation contrasts with the USA where both annual FOBT and screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy every 3 to 5 years are recommended from 50 years old. We seek to demonstrate that most of the benefit from the US screening policy would accrue from a single flexible sigmoidoscopy examination at age 55 to 60 years with appropriate colonoscopic surveillance for the 3% to 5% found to have high-risk adenomas (> or = 1 cm or villous histology). If applied nationally, this screening regimen could prevent about 5500 colorectal cancer cases and 3500 deaths in the UK each year, thus saving 40,000 years of life. We estimate that there would be little net cost to the National Health Service because savings obtained from treating fewer patients would largely offset the cost of screening. We recommend that a randomised trial to evaluate screening by single flexible sigmoidoscopy should start without delay. Such a trial would involve about 120,000 participants, and 15 years of follow-up would be required to obtain a clear answer on mortality, although information on incidence reduction would be available sooner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8095636     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90499-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  83 in total

1.  A time for change and a time for vision.

Authors:  A F Wright
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The early detection of colorectal cancer in primary care.

Authors:  R Jones; T Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Colorectal cancer screening in the UK: Joint Position Statement by the British Society of Gastroenterology, The Royal College of Physicians, and The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Authors:  J M Rhodes
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Are proximal colorectal cancers always associated with distal adenomas?

Authors:  A J M Watson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Protagonist: population based endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W S Atkin; J M A Northover
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Antagonist: population based endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D A L Macafee; J H Scholefield
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Screening for colorectal cancer: decisions in general practice.

Authors:  Leonard Leibovici; Abigail Fraser; Sarah Hellmann
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Can suicide in young men be prevented by improving access and delivery among primary care services?

Authors:  André Tylee; Paul Walters
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional education.

Authors:  John Horder
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Overexpression of CK20, MAP3K8 and EIF5A correlates with poor prognosis in early-onset colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Berrin Tunca; Gulcin Tezcan; Gulsah Cecener; Unal Egeli; Abdullah Zorluoglu; Tuncay Yilmazlar; Secil Ak; Omer Yerci; Ersin Ozturk; Gorkem Umut; Turkkan Evrensel
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.