Literature DB >> 9152184

Restorative proctocolectomy in patients older than fifty years.

J J Bauer1, S R Gorfine, I M Gelernt, M T Harris, I Kreel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to compare functional results, complications, preoperative durations of disease, and rates of dysplasia and neoplasia between older and younger chronic ulcerative colitis patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with mucosectomy.
METHODS: A total of 392 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of chronic ulcerative colitis underwent elective RPC with mucosection and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis. Pathologic reports were reviewed, with specific reference to findings of dysplasia or cancer. Functional results concerning the number of bowel movements per 24 hour period and the incidence of fecal soilage were obtained by direct or telephone patient interview.
FINDINGS: Group I consisted of 326 patients aged 5 to 49 (mean, 30.9) years and 160 women. Group II comprised 66 patients aged 50 to 74 (mean, 56.9) years and 29 women. Duration of disease was significantly longer in the older group (6.2 vs. 15.6 years; P < 0.001). The older group had significantly higher rates of dysplasia (29/326 vs. 19/66; P < 0.0001) and malignancy (14/326 vs. 9/66; P = 0.003). Rates of complication, hospital days following RPC, and total hospital days for all causes were comparable between groups. Perfect day-time continence was observed in 81.6 percent of Group I and 80 percent of Group II patients (213/261 vs. 40/50; P = 0.79). Perfect continence during sleep was observed in 65.1 percent of Group I and 62 percent of Group II patients (170/261 vs. 31/50; P = 0.67). Mean number of bowel movements per 24 hour period for Group I was 6.3 +/- 0.2 and for Group II was 7.4 +/- 0.5. Mean difference, one movement per 24 hours, was not significant (95 percent confidence interval, -0.02 to 2.1; t = 1.95, P = 0.055).
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that patients older than 50 years are suitable candidates for RPC with mucosectomy. Functional results and complication rates are similar to those observed among younger patients. Patients older than 50 years have a significantly higher rate of concurrent dysplasia and malignant degeneration than younger patients, most probably because of a longer duration of disease. RPC with mucosal excision potentially lowers this risk by elimination of all colorectal mucosa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9152184     DOI: 10.1007/bf02055379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  12 in total

Review 1.  Management of Ulcerative Colitis in the Elderly.

Authors:  Manish P Shrestha; Sasha Taleban
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion.

Authors:  H J Sugerman; E L Sugerman; J G Meador; H H Newsome; J M Kellum; E J DeMaria
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Medical and surgical complications of inflammatory bowel disease in the elderly: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dennis L Shung; Bincy Abraham; Joseph Sellin; Jason K Hou
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Surgical outcomes in the elderly with inflammatory bowel disease are similar to those in the younger population.

Authors:  Marita C Bautista; Mary F Otterson; Yelena Zadvornova; Amar S Naik; Daniel J Stein; Nanda Venu; Lilani P Perera
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Elderly Patient: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Tamara Donaldson; Karen Lasch; Vijay Yajnik
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.325

6.  When Not to Pouch: Important Considerations for Patient Selection for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis.

Authors:  Shannon Chang; Bo Shen; Feza Remzi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-08

7.  Does mesorectal preservation protect the ileoanal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy?

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Irina Radinski; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Prospective, age-related analysis of surgical results, functional outcome, and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio; Feza H Remzi; Jeff Hammel; James M Church; Tracy L Hull; Anthony J Senagore; Scott A Strong; Ian C Lavery
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Ileal pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Simon P Bach; Neil J Mortensen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Preservation of the anal transition zone in ulcerative colitis. Long-term effects on defecatory function.

Authors:  Alessandro Fichera; Laura Ragauskaite; Mark T Silvestri; Nicholas M Elisseou; Michele A Rubin; Roger D Hurst; Fabrizio Michelassi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.