Literature DB >> 10996073

Visible binocular beats from invisible monocular stimuli during binocular rivalry.

T A Carlson1, S He.   

Abstract

When two qualitatively different stimuli are presented at the same time, one to each eye, the stimuli can either integrate or compete with each other. When they compete, one of the two stimuli is alternately suppressed, a phenomenon called binocular rivalry [1,2]. When they integrate, observers see some form of the combined stimuli. Many different properties (for example, shape or color) of the two stimuli can induce binocular rivalry. Not all differences result in rivalry, however. Visual 'beats', for example, are the result of integration of high-frequency flicker between the two eyes [3,4], and are thus a binocular fusion phenomenon. It remains in dispute whether binocular fusion and rivalry can co-exist with one another [5-7]. Here, we report that rivalry and beats, two apparently opposing phenomena, can be perceived at the same time within the same spatial location. We hypothesized that the interocular difference in visual attributes that are predominantly processed in the Parvocellular pathway will lead to rivalry, and differences in visual attributes that are predominantly processed in the Magnocellular pathway tend to integrate. Further predictions based on this hypothesis were tested and confirmed.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10996073     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00672-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  14 in total

Review 1.  A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Carlo R Laing; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Distinct contributions of the magnocellular and parvocellular visual streams to perceptual selection.

Authors:  Rachel N Denison; Michael A Silver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Seeing the invisible: the scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Zhicheng Lin; Sheng He
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 4.  Binocular response modulation in the lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Kacie Dougherty; Michael C Schmid; Alexander Maier
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Stereoscopic Depth Perception during Binocular Rivalry.

Authors:  Timothy J Andrews; David Holmes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Stimulus fractionation by interocular suppression.

Authors:  Asieh Zadbood; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The effects of categorical and linguistic adaptation on binocular rivalry initial dominance.

Authors:  Vassilis Pelekanos; Daphne Roumani; Konstantinos Moutoussis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Binocular rivalry produced by temporal frequency differences.

Authors:  David Alais; Amanda Parker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The role of temporally coarse form processing during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Boxtel; David Alais; Casper J Erkelens; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Action imitation changes perceptual alternations in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Enrico Di Pace; Chiara Saracini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.