Literature DB >> 24446495

Time-based reward maximization.

Bilgehan Çavdaroğlu1, Mustafa Zeki, Fuat Balci.   

Abstract

Humans and animals time intervals from seconds to minutes with high accuracy but limited precision. Consequently, time-based decisions are inevitably subjected to our endogenous timing uncertainty, and thus require temporal risk assessment. In this study, we tested temporal risk assessment ability of humans when participants had to withhold each subsequent response for a minimum duration to earn reward and each response reset the trial time. Premature responses were not penalized in Experiment 1 but were penalized in Experiment 2. Participants tried to maximize reward within a fixed session time (over eight sessions) by pressing a key. No instructions were provided regarding the task rules/parameters. We evaluated empirical performance within the framework of optimality that was based on the level of endogenous timing uncertainty and the payoff structure. Participants nearly tracked the optimal target inter-response times (IRTs) that changed as a function of the level of timing uncertainty and maximized the reward rate in both experiments. Acquisition of optimal target IRT was rapid and abrupt without any further improvement or worsening. These results constitute an example of optimal temporal risk assessment performance in a task that required finding the optimal trade-off between the 'speed' (timing) and 'accuracy' (reward probability) of timed responses for reward maximization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision-making; interval timing; optimality; reward maximization; risk assessment; timing uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24446495      PMCID: PMC3895986          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  33 in total

1.  How pigeons discriminate the relative frequency of events.

Authors:  R Keen; A Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Common firing patterns of hippocampal cells in a differential reinforcement of low rates of response schedule.

Authors:  B Young; N McNaughton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Double dissociation of the effects of selective nucleus accumbens core and shell lesions on impulsive-choice behaviour and salience learning in rats.

Authors:  Helen H J Pothuizen; Ana L Jongen-Rêlo; Joram Feldon; Benjamin K Yee
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 4.  What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Subthalamic nucleus lesions increase impulsive action and decrease impulsive choice - mediation by enhanced incentive motivation?

Authors:  Jason M Uslaner; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 6.  The hippocampal-striatal axis in learning, prediction and goal-directed behavior.

Authors:  C M A Pennartz; R Ito; P F M J Verschure; F P Battaglia; T W Robbins
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Maximizing reinforcement rate on spaced-responding schedules under conditions of temporal uncertainty.

Authors:  J H Wearden
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Hippocampal "time cells" bridge the gap in memory for discontiguous events.

Authors:  Christopher J MacDonald; Kyle Q Lepage; Uri T Eden; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  The triple reuptake inhibitor DOV216,303 exhibits limited antidepressant-like properties in the differential reinforcement of low-rate 72-second responding assay, likely due to dopamine reuptake inhibition.

Authors:  Neil E Paterson; Fuat Balci; Una Campbell; Berend E Olivier; Taleen Hanania
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.153

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mice can count and optimize count-based decisions.

Authors:  Bilgehan Çavdaroğlu; Fuat Balcı
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

2.  Numerical error monitoring.

Authors:  Yalçın Akın Duyan; Fuat Balcı
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

3.  Optimal response rates in humans and rats.

Authors:  David M Freestone; Fuat Balcı; Patrick Simen; Russell M Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.478

4.  Everywhere and everything: The power and ubiquity of time.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Int J Comp Psychol       Date:  2015

5.  Rodents monitor their error in self-generated duration on a single trial basis.

Authors:  Tadeusz Władysław Kononowicz; Virginie van Wassenhove; Valérie Doyère
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Speed accuracy trade-off under response deadlines.

Authors:  Hakan Karşılar; Patrick Simen; Samantha Papadakis; Fuat Balcı
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.