Literature DB >> 10990310

The long-term outcome after central cord syndrome: a study of the natural history.

M L Newey1, P K Sen, R D Fraser.   

Abstract

We studied 32 patients with central cord syndrome who were managed conservatively. Six were under 50 years of age (group 1), 16 between 50 and 70 years (group 2) and ten over 70 years (group 3). At the time of discharge all patients in group 1 could walk independently and had good bladder control compared with 11 (69%) and 14 (88%) in group 2 and four (40%) and two (20%) in group 3, respectively. At follow-up after a mean of 8.6 years (4 to 15), ten patients had died leaving 22 in the study. All those in group 1 were alive, could walk independently and had bladder control. In group 2, 13 were alive of whom ten (77%) could walk independently and nine (69%) had bladder control. In group 3 only three were alive of whom only one was independent and none had bladder control. Function at discharge as measured by the ASIA motor scoring system was usually maintained or improved at follow-up, but patients over 70 years of age at injury did poorly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10990310     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b6.9866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  13 in total

1.  National trends in the management of central cord syndrome: an analysis of 16,134 patients.

Authors:  David W Brodell; Amit Jain; John C Elfar; Addisu Mesfin
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 2.  C2-C3 spinal fracture subluxation with ligamentous and vascular injury: a case report and review of management.

Authors:  Hepzibha Alexander; Ehsan Dowlati; Jason E McGowan; Robert B Mason; Amjad Anaizi
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2019-01-16

3.  Central cord syndrome in a high school wrestler: a case report.

Authors:  Valerie Rich; Elizabeth McCaslin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Clinical Trials in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Jayne Donovan; Steven Kirshblum
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.620

5.  Early vs Late Surgical Decompression for Central Cord Syndrome.

Authors:  Jetan H Badhiwala; Jefferson R Wilson; James S Harrop; Alexander R Vaccaro; Bizhan Aarabi; Fred H Geisler; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 16.681

6.  Traumatic central cord syndrome: neurological and functional outcome at 3 years.

Authors:  C M Stevenson; D P Dargan; J Warnock; S Sloan; R Espey; S Maguire; N Eames
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Cervical spine trauma.

Authors:  Joel A Torretti; Dilip K Sengupta
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Gait kinematic analysis in patients with a mild form of central cord syndrome.

Authors:  Angel Gil-Agudo; Soraya Pérez-Nombela; Arturo Forner-Cordero; Enrique Pérez-Rizo; Beatriz Crespo-Ruiz; Antonio del Ama-Espinosa
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 9.  Delayed surgical intervention in central cord syndrome with cervical stenosis.

Authors:  Moon Soo Park; Seong-Hwan Moon; Hwan-Mo Lee; Tae-Hwan Kim; Jae Keun Oh; Bo-Kyung Suh; Seung Jin Lee; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-11-06

Review 10.  Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Giorgio Scivoletto; Federica Tamburella; Letizia Laurenza; Monica Torre; Marco Molinari
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.