G J Macfarlane1, I M Hunt, A J Silman. 1. Unit of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK. G.Macfarlane@man.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the aetiology of forearm pain. In particular to determine the relative contribution of (a) psychological factors, features of somatisation, and health anxiety and behaviour, (b) work related mechanical factors, and (c) work related psychosocial factors in the onset of forearm pain. DESIGN: 2 year prospective population based cohort study, with retrospective assessment of exposures at work. SETTING: Altrincham, Greater Manchester. PARTICIPANTS: 1953 individuals aged 18-65 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Forearm pain of new onset. RESULTS: At follow up, 105 (8.3%) participants reported forearm pain of new onset lasting at least one day in the past month. Among these, 67% also reported shoulder pain, 65% back pain, and 45% chronic widespread pain. Increased risks of onset were associated with high levels of psychological distress (relative risk 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 3.8), reporting at least two other somatic symptoms (1.7, 0.95 to 3.0), and high scores on the illness behaviour subscale of the illness attitude scales. The two work related mechanical exposures associated with the highest risk of forearm pain in the future were repetitive movements of the arm (4.1, 1.7 to 10) or wrists (3.4, 1.3 to 8.7), whereas the strongest work related psychosocial risk was dissatisfaction with support from colleagues or supervisors (4.7, 2. 2 to 10). CONCLUSIONS: Psychological distress, aspects of illness behaviour, and other somatic symptoms are important predictors of onset of forearm pain in addition to work related psychosocial and mechanical factors. Misleading terms such as "cumulative trauma disorder" or "repetitive strain injury," implying a single uniform aetiology, should be avoided.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the aetiology of forearm pain. In particular to determine the relative contribution of (a) psychological factors, features of somatisation, and health anxiety and behaviour, (b) work related mechanical factors, and (c) work related psychosocial factors in the onset of forearm pain. DESIGN: 2 year prospective population based cohort study, with retrospective assessment of exposures at work. SETTING: Altrincham, Greater Manchester. PARTICIPANTS: 1953 individuals aged 18-65 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Forearm pain of new onset. RESULTS: At follow up, 105 (8.3%) participants reported forearm pain of new onset lasting at least one day in the past month. Among these, 67% also reported shoulder pain, 65% back pain, and 45% chronic widespread pain. Increased risks of onset were associated with high levels of psychological distress (relative risk 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 3.8), reporting at least two other somatic symptoms (1.7, 0.95 to 3.0), and high scores on the illness behaviour subscale of the illness attitude scales. The two work related mechanical exposures associated with the highest risk of forearm pain in the future were repetitive movements of the arm (4.1, 1.7 to 10) or wrists (3.4, 1.3 to 8.7), whereas the strongest work related psychosocial risk was dissatisfaction with support from colleagues or supervisors (4.7, 2. 2 to 10). CONCLUSIONS: Psychological distress, aspects of illness behaviour, and other somatic symptoms are important predictors of onset of forearm pain in addition to work related psychosocial and mechanical factors. Misleading terms such as "cumulative trauma disorder" or "repetitive strain injury," implying a single uniform aetiology, should be avoided.
Authors: A C Papageorgiou; G J Macfarlane; E Thomas; P R Croft; M I Jayson; A J Silman Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1997-05-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: F Wolfe; H A Smythe; M B Yunus; R M Bennett; C Bombardier; D L Goldenberg; P Tugwell; S M Campbell; M Abeles; P Clark Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1990-02
Authors: S S P Warnakulasuriya; R J Peiris-John; D Coggon; G Ntani; N Sathiakumar; A R Wickremasinghe Journal: Occup Med (Lond) Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 1.611
Authors: Ko Matsudaira; Keith T Palmer; Isabel Reading; Masami Hirai; Noriko Yoshimura; David Coggon Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2010-09-10 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Gareth T Jones; Elaine F Harkness; Elizabeth S Nahit; John McBeth; Alan J Silman; Gary J Macfarlane Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2006-08-25 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: J H Andersen; A Kaergaard; S Mikkelsen; U F Jensen; P Frost; J P Bonde; N Fallentin; J F Thomsen Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.402