Literature DB >> 10984206

The application of electrical impedance tomography to reduce systematic errors in the EEG inverse problem--a simulation study.

S Gonçalves1, J C de Munck, R M Heethaar, F H Lopes da Silva, B W van Dijk.   

Abstract

In this paper we propose a new method, using the principles of electrical impedance tomography (EIT), to correct for the systematic errors in the inverse problem (IP) of electroencephalography (EEG) that arise from the wrong specification of the electrical conductivities of the head compartments. By injecting known currents into pairs of electrodes and measuring the resulting potential differences recorded from the other electrodes, the equivalent conductivities of brain (sigma3), skull (sigma2) and scalp (sigma1) can be estimated. Since the geometry of the head is assumed to be known, the electrical conductivities remain as the only unknown parameters to be estimated. These conductivities can then be used in the inverse problem of EEG. The simulations performed in this study, using a three-layer sphere to model the head, prove the feasibility of the method, theoretically. Even in the presence of simulated noise with a value of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) equal to 10, estimations of the electrical conductivities within 5% of the true values were obtained. Simulations showed the existence of a strong relation between errors in the skull thickness and the EIT estimated conductivities. If the skull thickness is wrongly specified, for example overestimated by a factor of two, the conductivity determined by EIT is also overestimated by a factor of two. Simulations showed that this compensation effect also works in the inverse problem of EEG. Application of the proposed method reduces systematic errors in the dipole localization, up to an amount of 1 cm. However it proved to be ineffective to decrease the dipole strength error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10984206     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/21/3/304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  5 in total

1.  Modeling skull electrical properties.

Authors:  R J Sadleir; A Argibay
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.

Authors:  Daniel M Goldenholz; Seppo P Ahlfors; Matti S Hämäläinen; Dahlia Sharon; Mamiko Ishitobi; Lucia M Vaina; Steven M Stufflebeam
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  In-vivo measurements of human brain tissue conductivity using focal electrical current injection through intracerebral multicontact electrodes.

Authors:  Laurent Koessler; Sophie Colnat-Coulbois; Thierry Cecchin; Janis Hofmanis; Jacek P Dmochowski; Anthony M Norcia; Louis G Maillard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Effects of skull thickness, anisotropy, and inhomogeneity on forward EEG/ERP computations using a spherical three-dimensional resistor mesh model.

Authors:  Nicolas Chauveau; Xavier Franceries; Bernard Doyon; Bernard Rigaud; Jean Pierre Morucci; Pierre Celsis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Combining EEG and MEG for the reconstruction of epileptic activity using a calibrated realistic volume conductor model.

Authors:  Ümit Aydin; Johannes Vorwerk; Philipp Küpper; Marcel Heers; Harald Kugel; Andreas Galka; Laith Hamid; Jörg Wellmer; Christoph Kellinghaus; Stefan Rampp; Carsten Hermann Wolters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.