Literature DB >> 10981729

Population sampling in European air pollution exposure study, EXPOLIS: comparisons between the cities and representativeness of the samples.

T Rotko1, L Oglesby, N Künzli, M J Jantunen.   

Abstract

A personal air pollution exposure study, EXPOLIS, was accomplished in six European cities among 25- to 55-year-old citizens. In order to compare the exposure results and different microenvironmental concentrations between the cities it is crucial to know the extent and effects of the population bias that has developed in sampling procedure and the sociodemographic characteristics of each measured population sample. In each participating city a random Base sample of 2000 to 3000 individuals was drawn from the census and a Short Questionnaire (SQ) was mailed to them. Two subsamples of the Respondents of the mailed questionnaire were randomly drawn: Diary sample for 48-h time--microenvironment--activity diary and extensive exposure questionnaires, and Exposure sample for the same plus personal exposure and microenvironmental monitoring. Significant differences existed between the EXPOLIS cities in the population-sampling procedure. Population-sampling bias was evaluated by comparing the Respondents with the total city populations. The share of women and individuals with more than 14 years of education is higher among the Respondents than the overall population except in Athens. Men, younger (25-34 years old) and unmarried individuals were hardest to get to participate in the study at least in Helsinki. The two subsamples differ from Respondents in having more employed and higher- educated individuals. The largest sample bias occurred at the first and easiest step of responding to the mailed Short Screening Questionnaire, and not at the last and most demanding stage of participating in the exposure measurements. Exposure data from some of EXPOLIS cities can only be compared to other cities with caution considering their large population bias or different sample selections. However the selection bias is not necessarily a problem for analyses about predictors of personal exposures or analyses within a city.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10981729     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1053-4245


  4 in total

1.  The determinants of serum vitamin D levels in participants in a melanoma case-control study living in a temperate climate.

Authors:  John R Davies; Yu-Mei Chang; Helen Snowden; May Chan; Susan Leake; Birute Karpavicius; Sue Haynes; Kairen Kukalizch; Juliette Randerson-Moor; Faye Elliott; Julian Barth; Peter A Kanetsky; Mark Harland; D Timothy Bishop; Jennifer H Barrett; Julia A Newton-Bishop
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  An analysis of factors that influence personal exposure to toluene and xylene in residents of Athens, Greece.

Authors:  Evangelos C Alexopoulos; Christos Chatzis; Athena Linos
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Influence of the migration of radioactive contaminants in soil, resident occupancy, and variability in contamination on isodose lines for typical Northern European houses.

Authors:  Yvonne Hinrichsen; Robert Finck; Johan Martinsson; Christopher Rääf; Kasper Grann Andersson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Parameter and model uncertainty in a life-table model for fine particles (PM2.5): a statistical modeling study.

Authors:  Marko Tainio; Jouni T Tuomisto; Otto Hänninen; Juhani Ruuskanen; Matti J Jantunen; Juha Pekkanen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 5.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.