Literature DB >> 10980006

Directionality derived from differential sensitivity to monaural and binaural cues in the cat's medial geniculate body.

F K Samson1, P Barone, W A Irons, J C Clarey, P Poirier, T J Imig.   

Abstract

Azimuth tuning of high-frequency neurons in the primary auditory cortex (AI) is known to depend on binaural disparity and monaural spectral (pinna) cues present in broadband noise bursts. Single-unit response patterns differ according to binaural interactions, strength of monaural excitatory input from each ear, and azimuth sensitivity to monaural stimulation. The latter characteristic has been used as a gauge of neural sensitivity to monaural spectral directional cues. Azimuth sensitivity may depend predominantly on binaural disparity cues, exclusively on monaural spectral cues, or on both. The primary goal of this study was to determine whether each cortical response pattern corresponds to a similar pattern in the medial geniculate body (MGB) or whether some patterns are unique to the cortex. Single-unit responses were recorded from the ventral nucleus (Vn) and lateral part of the posterior group of thalamic nuclei (Po), tonotopic subdivisions of the MGB. Responses to free-field presentation of noise bursts that varied in azimuth and sound pressure level were obtained using methods identical to those used previously in field AI. Many units were azimuth sensitive, i.e., they responded well at some azimuths, and poorly, if at all, at others. These were studied further by obtaining responses to monaural noise stimulation, approximated by reversible plugging of one ear. Monaural directional (MD) cells were sensitive to the azimuth of monaural noise stimulation, whereas binaural directional (BD) cells were either insensitive to its azimuth or monaurally unresponsive. Thus BD and MD cells show differential sensitivity to monaural spectral cues. Monaural azimuth sensitivity could not be used to interpret the spectral sensitivity of predominantly binaural cells that exhibited strong binaural facilitation because they were either unresponsive or poorly responsive to monaural stimulation. The available evidence suggests that some such cells are sensitive to spectral cues. The results do not indicate the presence of any response types in AI that are not present in the MGB. Vn and Po contain similar classes of MD and BD cells. Because Po neurons project to the anterior auditory field, neurons in this cortical area also are likely to exhibit differential sensitivity to binaural disparity and monaural spectral cues. Comparison of these MGB data with a published report of cochlear nucleus (CN) single-unit azimuth tuning shows that MGB sensitivity to spectral cues is considerably stronger than CN sensitivity.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10980006     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.3.1330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

1.  Changes in the latency of mouse inferior colliculus neuron responses depending on the position and direction of movement of spectral contrast.

Authors:  E S Malinina
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-09

2.  Level dependence of spatial processing in the primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Glycinergic inhibition creates a form of auditory spectral integration in nuclei of the lateral lemniscus.

Authors:  Diana Coomes Peterson; Kiran Nataraj; Jeffrey Wenstrup
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Stimulus dependence of contralateral dominance in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Iris Steinmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Different stimuli, different spatial codes: a visual map and an auditory rate code for oculomotor space in the primate superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jungah Lee; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A population rate code of auditory space in the human cortex.

Authors:  Nelli H Salminen; Patrick J C May; Paavo Alku; Hannu Tiitinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The synaptic representation of sound source location in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Paul Chadderton; John P Agapiou; David McAlpine; Troy W Margrie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Evidence of multisensory plasticity: Asymmetrical medial geniculate body in people with one eye.

Authors:  Stefania S Moro; Krista R Kelly; Larissa McKetton; Brenda L Gallie; Jennifer K E Steeves
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.881

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.