Literature DB >> 19906961

The synaptic representation of sound source location in auditory cortex.

Paul Chadderton1, John P Agapiou, David McAlpine, Troy W Margrie.   

Abstract

A key function of the auditory system is to provide reliable information about the location of sound sources. Here, we describe how sound location is represented by synaptic input arriving onto pyramidal cells within auditory cortex by combining free-field acoustic stimulation in the frontal azimuthal plane with in vivo whole-cell recordings. We found that subthreshold activity was panoramic in that EPSPs could be evoked from all locations in all cells. Regardless of the sound location that evoked the largest EPSP, we observed a slowing in the EPSP slope along the contralateral-ipsilateral plane that was reflected in a temporal sequence of peak EPSP times. Contralateral sounds evoked EPSPs with earlier peak times and consequently generated action potential firing with shorter latencies than ipsilateral sounds. Thus, whereas spiking probability reflected the region of space evoking the largest EPSP, across the population, synaptic inputs enforced a gradient of spike latency and precision along the horizontal axis. Therefore, within auditory cortex and regardless of preferred location, the time window of synaptic integration reflects sound source location and ensures that spatial acoustic information is represented by relative timings of pyramidal cell output.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19906961      PMCID: PMC6354901          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2061-09.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  76 in total

1.  The coding of spatial location by single units in the lateral superior olive of the cat. I. Spatial receptive fields in azimuth.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Distributed coding of sound locations in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Theta oscillation coupled spike latencies yield computational vigour in a mammalian sensory system.

Authors:  Troy W Margrie; Andreas T Schaefer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Characterisation of multiple physiological fields within the anatomical core of rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Richard G Rutkowski; Alexandre A Miasnikov; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Response timing constraints on the cortical representation of sound time structure.

Authors:  D P Phillips; S E Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Creating a sense of auditory space.

Authors:  David McAlpine
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  The structure of spatial receptive fields of neurons in primary auditory cortex of the cat.

Authors:  J F Brugge; R A Reale; J E Hind
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Multiparametric auditory receptive field organization across five cortical fields in the albino rat.

Authors:  Daniel B Polley; Heather L Read; Douglas A Storace; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Sound localization by human listeners.

Authors:  J C Middlebrooks; D M Green
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  Sparse representation of sounds in the unanesthetized auditory cortex.

Authors:  Tomás Hromádka; Michael R Deweese; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  16 in total

1.  Contribution of inhibition to stimulus selectivity in primary auditory cortex of awake primates.

Authors:  Srivatsun Sadagopan; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Membrane potential dynamics of populations of cortical neurons during auditory streaming.

Authors:  Brandon J Farley; Arnaud J Noreña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  On the classification of pathways in the auditory midbrain, thalamus, and cortex.

Authors:  Charles C Lee; S Murray Sherman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Level dependence of spatial processing in the primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Functional mapping of single spines in cortical neurons in vivo.

Authors:  Xiaowei Chen; Ulrich Leischner; Nathalie L Rochefort; Israel Nelken; Arthur Konnerth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Synaptic mechanisms underlying interaural level difference selectivity in rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Michael Kyweriga; Whitney Stewart; Carolyn Cahill; Michael Wehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Free-field study on auditory localization and discrimination performance in older adults.

Authors:  Claudia Freigang; Kristina Schmiedchen; Ines Nitsche; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Sensory-evoked synaptic integration in cerebellar and cerebral cortical neurons.

Authors:  Paul Chadderton; Andreas T Schaefer; Stephen R Williams; Troy W Margrie
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Neuronal interaural level difference response shifts are level-dependent in the rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Michael Kyweriga; Whitney Stewart; Michael Wehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Asymmetric excitatory synaptic dynamics underlie interaural time difference processing in the auditory system.

Authors:  Pablo E Jercog; Gytis Svirskis; Vibhakar C Kotak; Dan H Sanes; John Rinzel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.