Literature DB >> 10978306

Usefulness of single nucleotide polymorphism data for estimating population parameters.

M K Kuhner1, P Beerli, J Yamato, J Felsenstein.   

Abstract

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data can be used for parameter estimation via maximum likelihood methods as long as the way in which the SNPs were determined is known, so that an appropriate likelihood formula can be constructed. We present such likelihoods for several sampling methods. As a test of these approaches, we consider use of SNPs to estimate the parameter Theta = 4N(e)micro (the scaled product of effective population size and per-site mutation rate), which is related to the branch lengths of the reconstructed genealogy. With infinite amounts of data, ML models using SNP data are expected to produce consistent estimates of Theta. With finite amounts of data the estimates are accurate when Theta is high, but tend to be biased upward when Theta is low. If recombination is present and not allowed for in the analysis, the results are additionally biased upward, but this effect can be removed by incorporating recombination into the analysis. SNPs defined as sites that are polymorphic in the actual sample under consideration (sample SNPs) are somewhat more accurate for estimation of Theta than SNPs defined by their polymorphism in a panel chosen from the same population (panel SNPs). Misrepresenting panel SNPs as sample SNPs leads to large errors in the maximum likelihood estimate of Theta. Researchers collecting SNPs should collect and preserve information about the method of ascertainment so that the data can be accurately analyzed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10978306      PMCID: PMC1461258     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  10 in total

1.  First International SNP Meeting at Skokloster, Sweden, August 1998. Enthusiasm mixed with scepticism about single-nucleotide polymorphism markers for dissecting complex disorders.

Authors:  A C Syvånen; U Landegren; A Isaksson; U Gyllensten; A Brookes
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of migration rates and effective population numbers in two populations using a coalescent approach.

Authors:  P Beerli; J Felsenstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Full reconstruction of Markov models on evolutionary trees: identifiability and consistency.

Authors:  J T Chang
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 2.144

5.  Maximum likelihood estimation of population growth rates based on the coalescent.

Authors:  M K Kuhner; J Yamato; J Felsenstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Heterosis or neutrality?

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Sampling theory for neutral alleles in a varying environment.

Authors:  R C Griffiths; S Tavaré
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1994-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Estimation of genetic variation at the DNA level from restriction endonuclease data.

Authors:  W J Ewens; R S Spielman; H Harris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach.

Authors:  J Felsenstein
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.395

  10 in total
  53 in total

1.  Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach.

Authors:  P Beerli; J Felsenstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Maximum likelihood estimation of recombination rates from population data.

Authors:  M K Kuhner; J Yamato; J Felsenstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Heterosis, marker mutational processes and population inbreeding history.

Authors:  A Tsitrone; F Rousset; P David
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection.

Authors:  Joshua M Akey; Ge Zhang; Kun Zhang; Li Jin; Mark D Shriver
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  New explicit expressions for relative frequencies of single-nucleotide polymorphisms with application to statistical inference on population growth.

Authors:  A Polanski; M Kimmel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Directional migration in the Hindu castes: inferences from mitochondrial, autosomal and Y-chromosomal data.

Authors:  Stephen Wooding; Christopher Ostler; B V Ravi Prasad; W Scott Watkins; Sandy Sung; Mike Bamshad; Lynn B Jorde
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Reconstituting the frequency spectrum of ascertained single-nucleotide polymorphism data.

Authors:  Rasmus Nielsen; Melissa J Hubisz; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Ascertainment biases in SNP chips affect measures of population divergence.

Authors:  Anders Albrechtsen; Finn Cilius Nielsen; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of demographic parameters using the frequency spectrum of unlinked single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  Alison M Adams; Richard R Hudson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Bayesian inference of local trees along chromosomes by the sequential Markov coalescent.

Authors:  Chaozhi Zheng; Mary K Kuhner; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.