Literature DB >> 10977432

Factors influencing use of the prostate-specific antigen screening test in primary care.

W P Moran1, S J Cohen, J S Preisser, J L Wofford, B J Shelton, M W McClatchey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test and digital rectal examination (DRE) in prostate cancer screening by primary care physicians. STUDY
DESIGN: Physician survey and retrospective medical record review.
METHODS: We randomly selected and reviewed the medical records of 3 cross-sectional samples of male patients and surveyed their primary care physicians at 1-year intervals. All the physicians practiced in Colorado. The study spanned 3 years, including late 1992, when the American Cancer Society recommended the use of PSA in a prostate cancer screening guideline.
RESULTS: We reviewed the medical records of 4772 male patients and surveyed 109 primary care physicians. We found that PSA testing for men aged 50 or older increased significantly from 1992 to 1994, from 24% in 1992 to 35% in 1993 and 40% in 1994 (overall odds ratio, 2.94; P < .05). Over the same time period, the DRE rate remained relatively unchanged (39% in 1992, 41% in 1993, and 36% in 1994). Overall PSA use was positively associated with patient age greater than 59 years, patient non-smoking status, physician "readiness to change cancer screening behavior," private insurance status, and nonsolo practice. Before the release of a prostate cancer screening guideline, participating physicians cited the American Cancer Society as the organization that most influenced their practice with respect to cancer screening. The magnitude of the reported influence of the American Cancer Society was correlated with the subsequent use of PSA in 1994 by primary care physicians after adjustment for change in DRE and baseline PSA rates, although the association did not reach statistical significance in multivariable regression models.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians in Colorado significantly increased their use of the PSA test from 1992 to 1994, during which time the American Cancer Society issued a guideline recommending the use of PSA for prostate cancer screening. The reported influence of the American Cancer Society on cancer screening practices correlated with the subsequent increase in PSA testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10977432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  18 in total

1.  Brief report: physicians and their personal prostate cancer-screening practices with prostate-specific antigen. A national survey.

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan; Michael J Barry; Sally W Vernon; Chul Ahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Trends in prostate specific antigen testing in Ireland: lessons from a country without guidelines.

Authors:  F J Drummond; A-E Carsin; L Sharp; H Comber
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Informed consent for cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen: how well are men getting the message?

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan; Sally W Vernon; Frederick T O'Donnell; Chul Ahn; Anthony Greisinger; Donnie W Aga
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Prostate-specific antigen testing among the elderly in community-based family medicine practices.

Authors:  Shawna V Hudson; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Jeanne M Ferrante; Grace Lu-Yao; A John Orzano; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

5.  Psychosocial factors associated with an increased frequency of prostate cancer screening in men ages 40 to 79 years: the Olmsted County study.

Authors:  Lauren P Wallner; Aruna V Sarma; Michael M Lieber; Jennifer L St Sauver; Debra J Jacobson; Michaela E McGree; Monica E Gowan; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Effect of guidelines on primary care physician use of PSA screening: results from the Community Tracking Study Physician Survey.

Authors:  Carmen E Guerra; Phyllis A Gimotty; Judy A Shea; José A Pagán; J Sanford Schwartz; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Physician perspectives on the importance of facts men ought to know about prostate-specific antigen testing.

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan; Sally W Vernon; Michelle C Haynes; Frederick T O'Donnell; Chul Ahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Communication message strategies for increasing knowledge about prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Lauren A McCormack; Carla M Bann; Pamela Williams-Piehota; David Driscoll; Cindy Soloe; Jon Poehlman; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Kathleen N Lohr; Stacey L Sheridan; Carol E Golin; Russell Harris; Samuel Cykert
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Factors prompting PSA-testing of asymptomatic men in a country with no guidelines: a national survey of general practitioners.

Authors:  Frances J Drummond; Anne-Elie Carsin; Linda Sharp; Harry Comber
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Factors related to use of prostate cancer screening: the Alberta Tomorrow Project.

Authors:  Harriet Richardson; Kristan J Aronson; Alison James; Elizabeth S McGregor; Heather Bryant
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2007-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.