Literature DB >> 19526414

Communication message strategies for increasing knowledge about prostate cancer screening.

Lauren A McCormack1, Carla M Bann, Pamela Williams-Piehota, David Driscoll, Cindy Soloe, Jon Poehlman, Tzy-Mey Kuo, Kathleen N Lohr, Stacey L Sheridan, Carol E Golin, Russell Harris, Samuel Cykert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This community-based intervention study examined the effects of 2 different message strategies for presenting information about the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test.
METHODS: A quasi-experimental longitudinal design with 2 intervention and 1 control group.
RESULTS: Knowledge increased significantly among participants who received either version of the intervention message and remained elevated at 12 months. Presenting information in the context of other men's health issues was associated with greater increases in knowledge relative to PSA only.
CONCLUSIONS: Community-based interventions can increase knowledge about prostate cancer screening. Clinicians need to take careful account of what their patients understand and correct misperceptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19526414     DOI: 10.1080/08858190902935498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  23 in total

1.  The benefits of, controversies surrounding, and professional recommendations for routine PSA testing: what do men believe?

Authors:  J K Zemencuk; R A Hayward; S J Katz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Screening for prostate cancer: recommendation and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-12-03       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Measures used in studies of informed decision making about cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Patricia Dolan Mullen; Jennifer Dacey Allen; Karen Glanz; Maria E Fernandez; Deborah J Bowen; Sandi L Pruitt; Beth A Glenn; Michael Pignone
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2006-12

4.  Demographics and health-related factors of men receiving prostate-specific antigen screening in Utah.

Authors:  R M Merrill
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Judith Swan; Nancy Breen; Ralph J Coates; Barbara K Rimer; Nancy C Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  The evaluation of two methods to facilitate shared decision making for men considering the prostate-specific antigen test.

Authors:  D L Frosch; R M Kaplan; V Felitti
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Trials of decision aids for prostate cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Sarah T Hawley; Suzanne Kneuper; E Wayne Holden; Leonardo A Stroud; Crystale Purvis Cooper; Judy M Berkowitz; Lawrence E Scholl; Smita S Saraykar; Valory N Pavlik
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Measuring patient knowledge of the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  David M Radosevich; Melissa R Partin; Sean Nugent; David Nelson; Ann Barry Flood; Jeremy Holtzman; Nancy Dillon; Michele Haas; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-08

9.  Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Floyd J Fowler; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The effect of qualitative vs. quantitative presentation of probability estimates on patient decision-making: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Annette M O'Connor; Elizabeth Drake; Jennifer Biggs; Valerie Hum; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  3 in total

1.  Behind Closed Doors: What Happens when Patients and Providers Talk about Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening?: Survey of the Effects of a Community-Based Intervention.

Authors:  Lauren McCormack; Pamela Williams-Piehota; Carla Bann
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Translating medical evidence to promote informed health care decisions.

Authors:  Lauren McCormack; Katherine Treiman; Carla Bann; Pamela Williams-Piehota; David Driscoll; Jon Poehlman; Cindy Soloe; Kathleen Lohr; Stacey Sheridan; Carol Golin; Samuel Cykert; Russell Harris
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Evaluating outcomes of community-based cancer education interventions: a 10-year review of studies.

Authors:  Alexandria Booker; Vanessa L Malcarne; Georgia Robins Sadler
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.037

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.