Literature DB >> 10976680

Evaluation of six inhalable aerosol samplers.

S N Li1, D A Lundgren, D Rovell-Rixx.   

Abstract

Six inhalable aerosol samplers were evaluated experimentally as area samplers using monodisperse solid particles with aerodynamic diameters ranging from 5 to 68 microm. Sampler performance and inside particle loss at two test wind speeds (0.55 and 1.1 m/sec) and three wind orientations (0, 90, and 180 degrees) were investigated. The six inhalable aerosol samplers tested were a RespiCon, an Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM), a seven-hole, a conical inhalable sampler, a prototype button sampler, and a closed-face 37-mm cassette. The area sampling performance of the RespiCon sampler matched the inhalable convention fairly well. The sampling performances of the other five samplers depended on wind speed, wind direction, and particle size, and they may not be appropriate for area sampling if the wind speeds are greater than 0.5 m/sec.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10976680     DOI: 10.1080/15298660008984562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIHAJ        ISSN: 1529-8663


  12 in total

1.  Solid versus liquid particle sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers when facing the wind.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; T Renee Anthony; Michael Van Dyke; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2011-09-29

2.  A rotating bluff-body disc for reduced variability in wind tunnel aerosol studies.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; T Renee Anthony; Michael van Dyke; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-11-22

3.  Field comparison of inhalable aerosol samplers applied in the european rubber manufacturing industry.

Authors:  Frank de Vocht; Daan Huizer; Maarten Prause; Kristina Jakobsson; Beata Peplonska; Kurt Straif; Hans Kromhout
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Field and wind tunnel comparison of four aerosol samplers using agricultural dusts.

Authors:  Stephen J Reynolds; Jason Nakatsu; Marvin Tillery; Thomas Keefe; John Mehaffy; Peter S Thorne; Kelley Donham; Matthew Nonnenmann; Vijay Golla; Patrick O'shaughnessy
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-05-14

5.  A Simple and Disposable Sampler for Inhalable Aerosol.

Authors:  Christian L'Orange; Kimberly Anderson; Darrah Sleeth; T Renée Anthony; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-10-14

6.  A comparison of two laboratories for the measurement of wood dust using button sampler and diffuse reflection infrared Fourier-transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS).

Authors:  Madalina M Chirila; Khachatur Sarkisian; Michael E Andrew; Cheol-Woong Kwon; Roy J Rando; Martin Harper
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-12-02

7.  Bioaerosol Sampling: Classical Approaches, Advances, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.809

8.  Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics modeling of particle uptake by an occupational air sampler using manually-scaled and adaptive grids.

Authors:  Andrea C Landázuri; A Eduardo Sáez; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.433

9.  Wood dust sampling: field evaluation of personal samplers when large particles are present.

Authors:  Taekhee Lee; Martin Harper; James E Slaven; Kiyoung Lee; Roy J Rando; Elizabeth H Maples
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-10-29

10.  Beryllium Concentrations at European Workplaces: Comparison of 'Total' and Inhalable Particulate Measurements.

Authors:  Heiko Kock; Terence Civic; Wolfgang Koch
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.