Literature DB >> 10973393

Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s.

K D Lillemoe1, G B Melton, J L Cameron, H A Pitt, K A Campbell, M A Talamini, P A Sauter, J Coleman, C J Yeo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the management and outcome after surgical reconstruction of 156 patients with postoperative bile duct strictures managed in the 1990s. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The management of postoperative bile duct strictures and major bile duct injuries remains a challenge for even the most skilled biliary tract surgeon. The 1990s saw a dramatic increase in the incidence of bile duct strictures and injuries from the introduction and widespread use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Although the management of these injuries and short-term outcome have been reported, long-term follow-up is limited.
METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on 156 patients treated at the Johns Hopkins Hospital with major bile duct injuries or postoperative bile duct strictures between January 1990 and December 1999. With the exception of bile duct injuries discovered and repaired during surgery, all patients underwent preoperative percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and placement of transhepatic biliary catheters before surgical repair. Follow-up was conducted by medical record review or telephone interview during January 2000.
RESULTS: Of the 156 patients undergoing surgical reconstruction, 142 had completed treatment with a mean follow-up of 57.5 months. Two patients died of reasons unrelated to biliary tract disease before the completion of treatment. Twelve patients (7.9%) had not completed treatment and still had biliary stents in place at the time of this report. Of patients who had completed treatment, 90. 8% were considered to have a successful outcome without the need for follow-up invasive, diagnos tic, or therapeutic interventional procedures. Patients with reconstruction after injury or stricture after laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a better overall outcome than patients whose postoperative stricture developed after other types of surgery. Presenting symptoms, number of stents, interval to referral, prior repair, and length of postoperative stenting were not significant predictors of outcome. Overall, a successful outcome, without the need for biliary stents, was obtained in 98% of patients, including those requiring a secondary procedure for recurrent stricture.
CONCLUSIONS: Major bile duct injuries and postoperative bile duct strictures remain a considerable surgical challenge. Management with preoperative cholangiography to delineate the anatomy and placement of percutaneous biliary catheters, followed by surgical reconstruction with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, is associated with a successful outcome in up to 98% of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10973393      PMCID: PMC1421156          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200009000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  33 in total

1.  Benign postoperative biliary strictures. Operate or dilate?

Authors:  H A Pitt; S L Kaufman; J Coleman; R I White; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Biliary reconstruction without transanastomotic stent.

Authors:  J T Innes; J J Ferrara; L C Carey
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases.

Authors:  D J Deziel; K W Millikan; S G Economou; A Doolas; S T Ko; M C Airan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Clinical pathway implementation improves outcomes for complex biliary surgery.

Authors:  H A Pitt; K P Murray; H M Bowman; J Coleman; T A Gordon; C J Yeo; K D Lillemoe; J L Cameron
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Management of major biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Branum; C Schmitt; J Baillie; P Suhocki; M Baker; A Davidoff; S Branch; R Chari; G Cucchiaro; E Murray
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Factors influencing outcome in patients with postoperative biliary strictures.

Authors:  H A Pitt; T Miyamoto; S K Parapatis; R K Tompkins; W P Longmire
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A M Davidoff; T N Pappas; E A Murray; D J Hilleren; R D Johnson; M E Baker; G E Newman; P B Cotton; W C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Biliary tract complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: imaging and intervention.

Authors:  S O Trerotola; S J Savader; G B Lund; A C Venbrux; S Sostre; K D Lillemoe; J L Cameron; F A Osterman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Benign biliary strictures. Surgery or endoscopy?

Authors:  P H Davids; A K Tanka; E A Rauws; T M van Gulik; D J van Leeuwen; L T de Wit; P C Verbeek; K Huibregtse; M N van der Heyde; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Indications and results of hepaticojejunostomy in benign strictures of the biliary tract.

Authors:  A Csendes; C Diaz; P Burdiles; O Nava; J Yarmuch; F Maluenda; E Fernandez
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1992-08
View more
  122 in total

1.  Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life.

Authors:  Genevieve B Melton; Keith D Lillemoe; John L Cameron; Patricia A Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  To err is human, but should we expect more from a surgeon?

Authors:  Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective.

Authors:  Lawrence W Way; Lygia Stewart; Walter Gantert; Kingsway Liu; Crystine M Lee; Karen Whang; John G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment.

Authors:  A Shamiyeh; W Wayand
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  An extrahepatic bile duct grafting using a bioabsorbable polymer tube.

Authors:  Masayasu Aikawa; Mitsuo Miyazawa; Kojun Okamoto; Yasuko Toshimitsu; Katsuya Okada; Naoe Akimoto; Yosuke Ueno; Isamu Koyama; Yoshito Ikada
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Intraoperative cholangiography in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era: why are we still debating?

Authors:  F Ausania; L R Holmes; F Ausania; S Iype; P Ricci; S A White
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Bile Duct Injury-from Injury to Repair: an Analysis of Management and Outcome.

Authors:  Pramod Kumar Mishra; Sundeep Singh Saluja; Mohammed Nayeem; Barjesh Chander Sharma; Nilesh Patil
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 8.  Current management of biliary strictures.

Authors:  Jennifer G Hall; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  [Interventions for benign biliary strictures].

Authors:  A Lubienski; M Duex; K Lubienski; J Blietz; G W Kauffmann; T Helmberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Bile duct replacement using an autologous femoral vein graft: an experimental study. Preliminary results.

Authors:  Pablo Capitanich; Javier Herrera; Mario L Iovaldi; Roque Balbuena; Gabriel Casas; Patricio Malizia; Maximiliano Bun; Norberto Mezzadri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.