Literature DB >> 10520925

Clinical pathway implementation improves outcomes for complex biliary surgery.

H A Pitt1, K P Murray, H M Bowman, J Coleman, T A Gordon, C J Yeo, K D Lillemoe, J L Cameron.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complex biliary surgery is associated with significant morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and high cost. Clinical pathway implementation has the potential to standardize treatment and improve outcomes. Therefore the aim of this analysis was to determine whether clinical pathway implementation and/or feedback of outcome data would alter hospital stay, charges, and mortality rates for complex biliary surgery at an academic medical center
METHODS: Pre- and postoperative length of stay, hospital charges, and mortality rates were monitored for 36 months before (period 1) and for 2 18-month periods (periods 2 and 3) after implementation of a clinical pathway for hepaticojejunostomy. Outcome data were provided to the surgeons 18 months after pathway implementation to determine whether further clinical practice improvement was possible.
RESULTS: From 1991 to 1997, 339 patients underwent hepaticojejunostomy at The Johns Hopkins Hospital for malignant and benign biliary obstruction. Total length of stay was 13.3 +/- 0.9 days for period 1 compared with 12.5 +/- 0.8 days for period 2 (not significant) and 10.1 +/- 0.3 days for period 3 (P < .01 vs period 1; P < .03 vs period 2). Hospital charges averaged $24,446 during period 1 compared with $23,338 during period 2 and $20,240 during period 3 (P < .01 vs periods 1 and 2). Hospital mortality rate was 4.5% during period 1 compared with 0.7% during periods 2 and 3 (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that implementation of a clinical pathway for hepaticojejunostomy reduces hospital mortality rates and that feedback of outcome data to surgeons results in further clinical practice improvement. Thus clinical pathway implementation and feedback are effective methods to control costs at an academic medical center.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10520925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  14 in total

1.  Hospital readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Dawn M Emick; Taylor S Riall; John L Cameron; Jordan M Winter; Keith D Lillemoe; Joann Coleman; Patricia K Sauter; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Critical pathway effectiveness: assessing the impact of patient, hospital care, and pathway characteristics using qualitative comparative analysis.

Authors:  Sydney M Dy; Pushkal Garg; Dorothy Nyberg; Patricia B Dawson; Peter J Pronovost; Laura Morlock; Haya Rubin; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  The volume-outcome relationship: don't believe everything you see.

Authors:  Caprice K Christian; Michael L Gustafson; Rebecca A Betensky; Jennifer Daley; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Clinical Pathways in surgery: should we introduce them into clinical routine? A review article.

Authors:  Ulrich Ronellenfitsch; Eric Rössner; Jens Jakob; Stefan Post; Peter Hohenberger; Matthias Schwarzbach
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  The impact of feedback of surgical outcome data on surgical performance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mahiben Maruthappu; Abhishek Trehan; Ashton Barnett-Vanes; Peter McCulloch; Matthew J Carty
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Surgical management of bile duct injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: perioperative results in 200 patients.

Authors:  Jason K Sicklick; Melissa S Camp; Keith D Lillemoe; Genevieve B Melton; Charles J Yeo; Kurtis A Campbell; Mark A Talamini; Henry A Pitt; JoAnn Coleman; Patricia A Sauter; John L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; G B Melton; J L Cameron; H A Pitt; K A Campbell; M A Talamini; P A Sauter; J Coleman; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Outcomes in pancreatic resection are negatively influenced by pre-operative hospitalization.

Authors:  Wande B Pratt; Charles M Vollmer; Mark P Callery
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Standardization of surgical care in a high-volume center improves survival in resected pancreatic head cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Delitto; Brian S Black; Holly B Cunningham; Sarunas Sliesoraitis; Xiaomin Lu; Chen Liu; George A Sarosi; Ryan M Thomas; Jose G Trevino; Steven J Hughes; Thomas J George; Kevin E Behrns
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Outcomes following pancreatic resection: variability among high-volume providers.

Authors:  Taylor S Riall; William H Nealon; James S Goodwin; Courtney M Townsend; Jean L Freeman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.