Literature DB >> 10969801

Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of 38 breast cancer cell lines: a basis for interpreting complementary DNA microarray data.

F Forozan1, E H Mahlamäki, O Monni, Y Chen, R Veldman, Y Jiang, G C Gooden, S P Ethier, A Kallioniemi, O P Kallioniemi.   

Abstract

Breast cancer cell lines provide a useful starting point for the discovery and functional analysis of genes involved in breast cancer. Here, we studied 38 established breast cancer cell lines by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to determine recurrent genetic alterations and the extent to which these cell lines resemble uncultured tumors. The following chromosomal gains were observed: 8q (75%), 1q (61%), 20q (55%), 7p (44%), 3q (39%), 5p (39%), 7q (39%), 17q (33%), 1p (30%), and 20p (30%), and the most common losses were: 8p (58%), 18q (58%), 1p (42%), Xp (42%), Xq (42%), 4p (36%), 11q (36%), 18p (33%), 10q (30%), and 19p (28%). Furthermore, 35 recurrent high-level amplification sites were identified, most often involving 8q23 (37%), 20q13 (29%), 3q25-q26 (24%), 17q22-q23 (16%), 17q23-q24 (16%), 1p13 (11%), 1q32 (11%), 5p13 (11%), 5p14 (11%), 11q13 (11%), 17q12-q21 (11%), and 7q21-q22 (11%). A comparison of DNA copy number changes found in the cell lines with those reported in 17 published studies (698 tumors) of uncultured tumors revealed a substantial degree of overlap. CGH copy number profiles may facilitate identification of important new genes located at the hotspots of such chromosomal alterations. This was illustrated by analyzing expression levels of 1236 genes using cDNA microarrays in four of the cell lines. Several highly overexpressed genes (such as RCH1 at 17q23, TOPO II at 17q21-q22, as well as CAS and MYBL2 at 20q13) were involved in these recurrent DNA amplifications. In conclusion, DNA copy number profiles were generated by CGH for most of the publicly available breast cancer cell lines and were made available on a web site (http://www.nhgri.nih.gov/DIR/CGB/++ +CR2000). This should facilitate the correlative analysis of gene expression and copy number as illustrated here by the finding by cDNA microarrays of several overexpressed genes that were amplified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10969801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  87 in total

1.  Identification of disease-specific genes in chronic pancreatitis using DNA array technology.

Authors:  H Friess; J Ding; J Kleeff; Q Liao; P O Berberat; J Hammer; M W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Lung cancer . 3: Fluorescence bronchoscopy: clinical dilemmas and research opportunities.

Authors:  A K Banerjee; P H Rabbitts; J George
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  The Stanford Microarray Database: data access and quality assessment tools.

Authors:  Jeremy Gollub; Catherine A Ball; Gail Binkley; Janos Demeter; David B Finkelstein; Joan M Hebert; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Heng Jin; Miroslava Kaloper; John C Matese; Mark Schroeder; Patrick O Brown; David Botstein; Gavin Sherlock
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  ExpressYourself: A modular platform for processing and visualizing microarray data.

Authors:  Nicholas M Luscombe; Thomas E Royce; Paul Bertone; Nathaniel Echols; Christine E Horak; Joseph T Chang; Michael Snyder; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Expressive genomic hybridisation: gene expression profiling at the cytogenetic level.

Authors:  F Al-Mulla; M Al-Maghrebi; G Varadharaj
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2003-08

6.  Balanced-PCR amplification allows unbiased identification of genomic copy changes in minute cell and tissue samples.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Cameron Brennan; Martha Rook; Jia Liu Wolfe; Christopher Leo; Lynda Chin; Hongjie Pan; Wei-Hua Liu; Brendan Price; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A hybrid BPSO-CGA approach for gene selection and classification of microarray data.

Authors:  Li-Yeh Chuang; Cheng-Huei Yang; Jung-Chike Li; Cheng-Hong Yang
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 1.479

8.  Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid blocks self-renewal and homotypic aggregation of inflammatory breast cancer spheroids.

Authors:  Fredika M Robertson; Wendy A Woodward; Ross Pickei; Zaiming Ye; William Bornmann; Ashutosh Pal; Zhenghong Peng; Carolyn S Hall; Massimo Cristofanilli
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Overexpression of CK20, MAP3K8 and EIF5A correlates with poor prognosis in early-onset colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Berrin Tunca; Gulcin Tezcan; Gulsah Cecener; Unal Egeli; Abdullah Zorluoglu; Tuncay Yilmazlar; Secil Ak; Omer Yerci; Ersin Ozturk; Gorkem Umut; Turkkan Evrensel
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  STEAP1 is over-expressed in breast cancer and down-regulated by 17beta-estradiol in MCF-7 cells and in the rat mammary gland.

Authors:  Cláudio J B Maia; Sílvia Socorro; Fernando Schmitt; Cecília R A Santos
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 3.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.