Literature DB >> 10969438

A comparison between articaine HCl and lidocaine HCl in pediatric dental patients.

S F Malamed1, S Gagnon, D Leblanc.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Three identical single-dose, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled multicenter studies were conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of articaine HCl (4% with epinephrine 1:100,000) to that of lidocaine HCl (2% with epinephrine 1:100,000) in patients aged 4 years to 79 years, with subgroup analysis on subjects 4 to < 13 years.
METHODS: Fifty subjects under the age of 13 years were treated in the articaine group and 20 subjects under the age of 13 were treated with lidocaine. Subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive articaine or lidocaine. Efficacy was determined on a gross scale immediately following the procedure by having both the subject and investigator rate the pain experienced by the subject during the procedure using a visual analog scale (VAS). Safety was evaluated by measuring vital signs before and after administration of anesthetic (1 and 5 minutes post-medication and at the end of the procedure) and by assessing adverse events throughout the study. Adverse events were elicited during telephone follow-up at 24 hours and 7 days after the procedure.
RESULTS: Pediatric patients received equal volumes, but higher mg/kg doses, of articaine than lidocaine during both simple and complex dental procedures. Pain ratings: Articaine: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) scores (from 0 to 10 cm) by patients 4 to < 13 years of age were 0.5 for simple procedures and 1.1 for complex procedures, and average investigator scores were 0.4 and 0.6 for simple and complex procedures, respectively. Lidocaine: patients 0.7 (simple) and 2.3 (complex); investigators 0.3 (simple) and 2.8 (complex). Adverse events: No serious adverse events related to the articaine occurred. The only adverse event considered related to articaine was accidental lip injury in one patient.
CONCLUSIONS: VAS scores indicate that articaine is an effective local anesthetic in children and that articaine is as effective as lidocaine when measured on this gross scale. Articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000 is a safe and effective local anesthetic for use in pediatric dentistry. Time to onset and duration of anesthesia are appropriate for clinical use and are comparable to those observed for other commercially available local anesthetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10969438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 0164-1263            Impact factor:   1.874


  28 in total

1.  Masking the bitter taste of injectable lidocaine HCl formulation for dental procedures.

Authors:  Yangjie Wei; Michael P Nedley; Sarit B Bhaduri; Xavier Bredzinski; Sai H S Boddu
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.

Authors:  John Nusstein; Jeffrey Berlin; Al Reader; Mike Beck; Joel M Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2004

3.  Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth.

Authors:  Nilesh V Rathi; Anushree A Khatri; Akshat G Agrawal; Sudhindra Baliga M; Nilima R Thosar; Shravani G Deolia
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2019

4.  Anesthetic Efficacy of 4 % Articaine During Extraction of the Mandibular Posterior Teeth by Using Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Buccal Infiltration Techniques.

Authors:  Khalid E El-Kholey
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-02-02

Review 5.  Articaine use in children: a review.

Authors:  R Leith; K Lynch; A C O'Connell
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2012-12

6.  Comparison of the effectiveness of lidocaine in permanent maxillary teeth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.

Authors:  Ramesh Kumaresan; Balamanikanda Srinivasan; Sivakumar Pendayala
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-04-27

7.  Anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine mandibular buccal infiltration compared to 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block in children with irreversible pulpitis.

Authors:  Veena Arali; Mytri P
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-04-01

8.  Comparison of Effects Exerted by 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration and 2% Lidocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block on Pain Perception and Behavioral Feedback of Children during Pulp Treatment of Mandibular Second Primary Molars.

Authors:  Leila Erfanparast; Mahdi Rahbar; Maryam Pourkazemi; Masoumeh Vatandoust; Sabra Balar; Ali Vafaei
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2020-12

9.  Influence of local anesthetics with or without epinephrine 1/80000 on blood pressure and heart rate: A randomized double-blind experimental clinical trial.

Authors:  Mohammad Ketabi; Mehrnaz Sadighi Shamami; Maryam Alaie; Mehrnoosh Sadighi Shamami
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-07

10.  Effect of calcium hydroxide mixed with lidocaine hydrochloride on postoperative pain in teeth with irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis: a preliminary randomized controlled prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Hakan Arslan; Ezgi Doğanay Yıldız; Hüseyin Sinan Topçuoğlu; Ebru Tepecik; Gizem Taş
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.