Literature DB >> 10968434

Normalised intrinsic mortality risk in liver transplantation: European Liver Transplant Registry study.

R Adam1, V Cailliez, P Majno, V Karam, P McMaster, R Y Caine, J O'Grady, R Pichlmayr, P Neuhaus, J B Otte, K Hoeckerstedt, H Bismuth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No model exists for liver transplantation to estimate the mortality risk in a given patient, and no standard by which to assess performance in different centres. We investigated the intrinsic mortality risk in the absence of known mortality risk factors.
METHODS: We identified mortality risk factors and risk ratios quantified in data from the European Liver Transplant Registry (22,089 patients at 102 centres in 18 countries) registered from 1988 to 1997. To develop a model of the intrinsic risk and the risk ratios for specific factors, univariate and multivariate analyses were done separately for the overall population, for adults, and for children younger than 15 years, and the number of deaths were estimated. We validated the model by comparing mortality in patients without risk factors with the model-adjusted mortality in patients with risk factors.
FINDINGS: Overall 5-year and 8-year actuarial survival was 66% (95% CI 65-66) and 61% (60-62). 65% of deaths occurred within 6 months. Retransplantation, transplantation for cancer, acute liver failure, fewer than 20 split-liver grafts per year, and a centre workload of fewer than 25 transplants per year were the main risk factors of 12 identified factors. 1-year and 5-year death rates among adults with no risk factors were similar to model estimates (15 [13-16] vs 14% [13-15], and 22 (20-24) vs 23% [21-24]). Corresponding data for paediatric transplants were 9% (7-12) compared with 11% (9-12) and 13% (10-17) compared with 14% (11-16). The reduction of mortality risk in high-volume centres was even greater in patients without risk factors (48 vs 23%, p<0.001).
INTERPRETATION: The normalised intrinsic mortality risk can be combined with the relative risk ratios of known risk factors to better estimate the mortality risk of a given procedure in a given patient. Centres can assess performance by removing potential bias of donor and recipient selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10968434     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02603-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  40 in total

Review 1.  Developments in liver transplantation.

Authors:  J Neuberger
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  A Macaca mulatta model of fulminant hepatic failure.

Authors:  Ping Zhou; Jie Xia; Gang Guo; Zi-Xing Huang; Qiang Lu; Li Li; Hong-Xia Li; Yu-Jun Shi; Hong Bu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Monitoring surgical and medical outcomes: the Bernoulli cumulative SUM chart. A novel application to assess clinical interventions.

Authors:  G Leandro; N Rolando; G Gallus; K Rolles; A K Burroughs
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Which are the right cells to be used in a bioartificial liver?

Authors:  Robert A F M Chamuleau; Tanja Deurholt; Ruurdtje Hoekstra
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.584

5.  Relationship between provider volume and outcomes for orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  John E Scarborough; Ricardo Pietrobon; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Carlos E Marroquin; Bradley H Collins; Dev M Desai; Paul C Kuo; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  [Minimum thresholds under scrutiny].

Authors:  D Pieper; M Eikermann; T Mathes; B Prediger; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Comprehensive risk assessment for early neurologic complications after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Si-Yuan Wu; Teng-Wei Chen; An-Chieh Feng; Hsiu-Lung Fan; Chung-Bao Hsieh; Kuo-Piao Chung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Temporal trends in liver transplant centre volume in the USA.

Authors:  Elisabeth T Tracy; Kyla M Bennett; Emeline M Aviki; Theodore N Pappas; Bradley H Collins; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Carlos E Marroquin; Paul C Kuo; John E Scarborough
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Deceased donor liver transplant: Experience from a public sector hospital in India.

Authors:  Viniyendra Pamecha; Deeplaxmi Purushottam Borle; Senthil Kumar; Kishore Gurumoorthy Subramanya Bharathy; Piyush Kumar Sinha; Shridhar Vasantrao Sasturkar; Vibuti Sharma; Chandra Kant Pandey; Shiv Kumar Sarin
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-29

10.  [Liver transplantation in elderly patients].

Authors:  N R Frühauf; A Frilling; M Malagó; C E Broelsch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.