Literature DB >> 24232742

[Minimum thresholds under scrutiny].

D Pieper, M Eikermann, T Mathes, B Prediger, E A M Neugebauer.   

Abstract

Minimum volume thresholds for specific medical treatments have been implemented in Germany since 2004. In the last 9 years the catalogue of procedures, which is determined by the Federal Joint Committee, has changed continuously and currently consists of 8 procedures. In this article the basis of decision making for the enrolment in the catalogue of procedures and the determination of minimum volume thresholds are examined. An overview of systematic reviews was published in 2012 outlining the correlation between the volume components and medical outcome. The body of evidence identified is compared to the current regulatory conditions of the Federal Joint Committee.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24232742     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-013-2644-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  9 in total

1.  The effect of the volume of procedures at transplantation centers on mortality after liver transplantation.

Authors:  E B Edwards; J P Roberts; M A McBride; J A Schulak; L G Hunsicker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature.

Authors:  Ethan A Halm; Clara Lee; Mark R Chassin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Association of center volume with outcome after liver and kidney transplantation.

Authors:  David A Axelrod; Mary K Guidinger; Keith P McCullough; Alan B Leichtman; Jeffrey D Punch; Robert M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Margaret Sampson; Mohammed T Ansari; Jun Ji; Steve Doucette; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Varied definitions of hospital volume did not alter the conclusions of volume-outcome analyses.

Authors:  Girish S Kulkarni; Andreas Laupacis; David R Urbach; Neil E Fleshner; Peter C Austin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  High-surgical-volume hospitals associated with better quality and lower cost of kidney transplantation in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shu-Yun Tsao; Wui-Chiang Lee; Che-Chuan Loong; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Jen-Hwey Chiu; Ling-Chen Tai
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.743

Review 7.  How small is too small? A systematic review of center volume and outcome after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Stephen J Pettit; Pardeep S Jhund; Nathaniel M Hawkins; Roy S Gardner; Saleem Haj-Yahia; John J V McMurray; Mark C Petrie
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-11-06

Review 8.  State of evidence on the relationship between high-volume hospitals and outcomes in surgery: a systematic review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Dawid Pieper; Tim Mathes; Edmund Neugebauer; Michaela Eikermann
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Normalised intrinsic mortality risk in liver transplantation: European Liver Transplant Registry study.

Authors:  R Adam; V Cailliez; P Majno; V Karam; P McMaster; R Y Caine; J O'Grady; R Pichlmayr; P Neuhaus; J B Otte; K Hoeckerstedt; H Bismuth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-19       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  Perioperative outcomes of esophageal cancer surgery in a mid-volume institution in the era of centralization.

Authors:  Silvio Däster; Savas D Soysal; Luca Koechlin; Lea Stoll; Ralph Peterli; Markus von Flüe; Christoph Ackermann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  [Complications in surgery: Topic of the year 2015 in Der Chirurg].

Authors:  H Dralle
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  [Minimum caseload requirements in urologic oncology: not without evidence from health services research].

Authors:  J Huber; C Groeben; M P Wirth; F Hoffmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  [Minimum numbers in surgery].

Authors:  A Buia; E Hanisch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  [What can and cannot be achieved by registries : Perspective of the registry working group of the German Network of Health Services Research].

Authors:  E A M Neugebauer; J Stausberg
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  Minimum Volume Discussion in the Treatment of Colon and Rectal Cancer: A Review of the Current Status and Relevance of Surgeon and Hospital Volume regarding Result Quality and the Impact on Health Economics.

Authors:  Karl-Heinrich Link; Peter Coy; Mark Roitman; Carola Link; Marko Kornmann; Ludger Staib
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-04-20

7.  Hospital volume and mortality for 25 types of inpatient treatment in German hospitals: observational study using complete national data from 2009 to 2014.

Authors:  Ulrike Nimptsch; Thomas Mansky
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.