OBJECTIVES: To determine satisfaction in regard to information concerning, and support and facilities for relatives in the intensive care unit (ICU), and to compare this with the staff's expectations on these issues; to determine relatives' degree of psychological distress and use of hypnotics, anxiolytics, and antidepressants; finally, to compare the distress of relatives of survivors and relatives of non-survivors. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: University-affiliated ICU. METHODS: Relatives of 50 patients who survived at least 6 days in the ICU and relatives of 18 non-survivors who stayed for at least 24 h anonymously completed a mailed questionnaire at home 4 weeks after treatment in the ICU. Forty-three staff members (69%) answered the questionnaire. The degree of satisfaction was measured on a five-point scale (0-4). MAIN RESULTS: The average satisfaction scores were 3.4+/-0.6 SD for relatives of survivors and 3.4+/-0.5 for relatives of non-survivors. Staff expected a significantly lower degree of satisfaction, with a score of 2.9+/-0.5 (P<0.001). The distress scores of relatives of survivors (2.7+/-1.0) were no higher than the ones of relatives of non-survivors (2.4+/-0.6) during the ICU stay, but significantly lower than staff expectations (3.2+/-0.5) (P<0.01). The use of medication was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The relatives' satisfaction was greater than anticipated by the staff. Staff generally expected a higher degree of distress among relatives than was actually the case. Relatives were very satisfied with the support and communication in the ICU despite substantial distress. Relatives of survivors and non-survivors were equally satisfied.
OBJECTIVES: To determine satisfaction in regard to information concerning, and support and facilities for relatives in the intensive care unit (ICU), and to compare this with the staff's expectations on these issues; to determine relatives' degree of psychological distress and use of hypnotics, anxiolytics, and antidepressants; finally, to compare the distress of relatives of survivors and relatives of non-survivors. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: University-affiliated ICU. METHODS: Relatives of 50 patients who survived at least 6 days in the ICU and relatives of 18 non-survivors who stayed for at least 24 h anonymously completed a mailed questionnaire at home 4 weeks after treatment in the ICU. Forty-three staff members (69%) answered the questionnaire. The degree of satisfaction was measured on a five-point scale (0-4). MAIN RESULTS: The average satisfaction scores were 3.4+/-0.6 SD for relatives of survivors and 3.4+/-0.5 for relatives of non-survivors. Staff expected a significantly lower degree of satisfaction, with a score of 2.9+/-0.5 (P<0.001). The distress scores of relatives of survivors (2.7+/-1.0) were no higher than the ones of relatives of non-survivors (2.4+/-0.6) during the ICU stay, but significantly lower than staff expectations (3.2+/-0.5) (P<0.01). The use of medication was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The relatives' satisfaction was greater than anticipated by the staff. Staff generally expected a higher degree of distress among relatives than was actually the case. Relatives were very satisfied with the support and communication in the ICU despite substantial distress. Relatives of survivors and non-survivors were equally satisfied.
Authors: Daren K Heyland; Graeme M Rocker; Peter M Dodek; Demetrios J Kutsogiannis; Elsie Konopad; Deborah J Cook; Sharon Peters; Joan E Tranmer; Christopher J O'Callaghan Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoit Vallet Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-02-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Kali A Barrett; Niall D Ferguson; Valerie Athaide; Deborah J Cook; Jan O Friedrich; Ellen McDonald; Ruxandra Pinto; Orla M Smith; James Stevenson; Damon C Scales Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Ilse van Beusekom; Ferishta Bakhshi-Raiez; Nicolette F de Keizer; Dave A Dongelmans; Marike van der Schaaf Journal: Crit Care Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 9.097