Literature DB >> 8917952

An improved multipoint sib-pair analysis of quantitative traits.

D W Fulker1, S S Cherny.   

Abstract

Kruglyak and Lander (1995) recently published a multipoint sib-pair procedure based on the expected distribution of zero, one and two marker alleles shared identical by descent (ibd) and the method of maximum-likelihood (ML). Their approach uses phenotypic sib-pair differences, which ignores the bivariate structure of sib-pair data. Their simulations suggested that their method was more powerful than the regression method of Haseman and Elston (1972). We show through computation and simulation that their approach can be made more powerful still if the bivariate nature of sib-pair data is acknowledged. In addition, methods based on the average number of shared alleles that also employ bivariate ML procedures (Nance and Neale, 1989; Xu and Atchley, 1995) are more powerful than the approach they recommend and very similar to true ML using the distribution of ibd. The simple ML approach using the average number of shared alleles that we recommend seems to offer both optimal power and flexibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8917952     DOI: 10.1007/bf02359758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  6 in total

1.  Partitioned twin analysis: a power study.

Authors:  W E Nance; M C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Multipoint interval mapping of quantitative trait loci, using sib pairs.

Authors:  D W Fulker; S S Cherny; L R Cardon
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A random model approach to interval mapping of quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  S Xu; W R Atchley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Complete multipoint sib-pair analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits.

Authors:  L Kruglyak; E S Lander
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Locating human quantitative trait loci: guidelines for the selection of sibling pairs for genotyping.

Authors:  L Eaves; J Meyer
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus.

Authors:  J K Haseman; R C Elston
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.805

  6 in total
  31 in total

1.  Transformation of sib-pair values for the Haseman-Elston method.

Authors:  D Wang; S Lin; R Cheng; X Gao; F A Wright
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Testing the robustness of the likelihood-ratio test in a variance-component quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure.

Authors:  D B Allison; M C Neale; R Zannolli; N J Schork; C I Amos; J Blangero
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data.

Authors:  P C Sham; S S Cherny; S Purcell; J K Hewitt
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-04-12       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Composite statistics for QTL mapping with moderately discordant sibling pairs.

Authors:  W F Forrest; E Feingold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Genetic studies of autism: from the 1970s into the millennium.

Authors:  M Rutter
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2000-02

6.  Testing the robustness of the new Haseman-Elston quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure.

Authors:  D B Allison; J R Fernández; M Heo; T M Beasley
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-05-11       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  A score-statistic approach for the mapping of quantitative-trait loci with sibships of arbitrary size.

Authors:  K Wang; J Huang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-12-27       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Bias in estimates of quantitative-trait-locus effect in genome scans: demonstration of the phenomenon and a method-of-moments procedure for reducing bias.

Authors:  David B Allison; Jose R Fernandez; Moonseong Heo; Shankuan Zhu; Carol Etzel; T Mark Beasley; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  A unified Haseman-Elston method for testing linkage with quantitative traits.

Authors:  X Xu; S Weiss; X Xu; L J Wei
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-08-28       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Linkage analysis of extremely discordant and concordant sibling pairs identifies quantitative-trait loci that influence variation in the human personality trait neuroticism.

Authors:  Jan Fullerton; Matthew Cubin; Hemant Tiwari; Chenxi Wang; Amarjit Bomhra; Stuart Davidson; Sue Miller; Christopher Fairburn; Guy Goodwin; Michael C Neale; Simon Fiddy; Richard Mott; David B Allison; Jonathan Flint
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.