Literature DB >> 10959091

Characterization of centromere alterations in liposarcomas.

N Sirvent1, A Forus, W Lescaut, F Burel, S Benzaken, M Chazal, A Bourgeon, J R Vermeesch, O Myklebost, C Turc-Carel, N Ayraud, J M Coindre, F Pedeutour.   

Abstract

Supernumerary ring and large marker chromosomes are a characteristic of atypical lipomas and well-differentiated liposarcomas (ALP-WDLPS) and are composed of amplified 12q14-15 sequences in association with variable segments from other chromosomes. Although stably transmitted, these chromosomes contain centromeric alterations, showing no detectable alpha-satellite sequences. We performed C-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and immunostaining with anti-centromere antibodies in 8 cases of liposarcomas with supernumerary rings and large markers, including 5 ALP-WDLPS and 3 dedifferentiated-LPS and high-grade LPS. Our results with alpha-satellite probes and anti-CENPB antibodies confirm the lack of detectable alpha-satellite sequences in the five ALP-WDLPS supernumerary chromosomes, whereas centromeric activity was proved by the detection of kinetochores by using anti-CENPC antibodies. In contrast, the high grade and dedifferentiated liposarcomas showed a different pattern. In 2 cases, amplified chromosome 12 sequences, including amplification of alpha-satellite 12 sequences in 1 case, were present on chromosomes with typical centromeres. In another case, the rings were similar to WDLPS-ALP rings, but a large marker contained a chromosome 5 centromere and amplified alpha-satellite sequences from chromosome 8. ALP-WDLPS is the first example of a tumor class for which the presence of stable analphoid chromosomes is a constant and specific abnormality. Formation of newly derived centromeres, so-called neocentromeres, could be an original and effective way to maintain a selective advantage in neoplastic cells by conferring stability to the supernumerary chromosomes of ALP-WDLPS. The activation of normally non-centromeric sequences might be obtained by an epigenetic mechanism due to the peculiar chromatin conformation of these highly complex chromosomes. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10959091     DOI: 10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999<::aid-gcc1014>3.0.co;2-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  19 in total

Review 1.  Neocentromeres and epigenetically inherited features of centromeres.

Authors:  Laura S Burrack; Judith Berman
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 2.  Putting CENP-A in its place.

Authors:  Madison E Stellfox; Aaron O Bailey; Daniel R Foltz
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Neocentromeres: new insights into centromere structure, disease development, and karyotype evolution.

Authors:  Owen J Marshall; Anderly C Chueh; Lee H Wong; K H Andy Choo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Chromatin dynamics during the cell cycle at centromeres.

Authors:  Sebastian Müller; Geneviève Almouzni
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  Flexibility of centromere and kinetochore structures.

Authors:  Laura S Burrack; Judith Berman
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  The Hidden Genomic and Transcriptomic Plasticity of Giant Marker Chromosomes in Cancer.

Authors:  Gemma Macchia; Marco Severgnini; Stefania Purgato; Doron Tolomeo; Hilen Casciaro; Ingrid Cifola; Alberto L'Abbate; Anna Loverro; Orazio Palumbo; Massimo Carella; Laurence Bianchini; Giovanni Perini; Gianluca De Bellis; Fredrik Mertens; Mariano Rocchi; Clelia Tiziana Storlazzi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Genetic and epigenetic effects on centromere establishment.

Authors:  Yick Hin Ling; Zhongyang Lin; Karen Wing Yee Yuen
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Strength of molecular cytogenetic analyses for adjusting the diagnosis of renal cell carcinomas with both clear cells and papillary features: a study of three cases.

Authors:  Juliette Haudebourg; Benjamin Hoch; Thibault Fabas; Nathalie Cardot-Leccia; Fanny Burel-Vandenbos; Annick Vieillefond; Jean Amiel; Jean-François Michiels; Florence Pedeutour
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Prognostic relevance of Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer grade and MDM2 amplification levels in dedifferentiated liposarcoma: a study of 50 cases.

Authors:  George Jour; Ashley Gullet; Mingdong Liu; Benjamin L Hoch
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 10.  Well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Coindre; Florence Pédeutour; Alain Aurias
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.