Literature DB >> 1095839

Copayments for ambulatory care: penny-wise and pound-foolish.

M I Roemer, C E Hopkins, L Carr, F Gartside.   

Abstract

The California "copayment experiment" imposed a charge of $1 on certain Medicaid beneficiaries for the first two visits to a doctor and 50 cents for the first two drug prescriptions each month, effective January 1, 1972. Data on utilization rates were gathered for six months before this date and for 12 months after it. While other administrative requirements, like prior authorization of certain services, doubtless also played a part, it was found that, following the start of copayment, utilization of ambulatory doctor's office visits and other services associated with them showed a decline, relative to that of the non-copayment cohort. After a brief lag, however, hospitalization rates in the copay cohort rose to levels higher than those of the non-copayment cohort-more than offsetting the savings to the state from the reduction of ambulatory service use rates. Due presumably to the neglect of early medical care because of the inhibiting effect of the copayments, these higher use rates of costly hospitalizations suggest that financial deterrents on access to ambulatory service by poor people are penny-wise and pound-foolish, not to mention their effects on health and well-being.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1095839     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-197506000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  16 in total

1.  How patient cost-sharing trends affect adherence and outcomes: a literature review.

Authors:  Michael T Eaddy; Christopher L Cook; Ken O'Day; Steven P Burch; C Ron Cantrell
Journal:  P T       Date:  2012-01

2.  Impact of consumer fees on drug utilisation.

Authors:  D G Smith; D M Kirking
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Economic impact of cost-containment strategies in third party programmes in the US (part I).

Authors:  C E Reeder; E W Lingle; R M Schulz; R P Mauch; B S Nightengale; C A Pedersen; M L Watrous; S E Zetzl
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Copayments for ambulatory care in Germany: a natural experiment using a difference-in-difference approach.

Authors:  Jonas Schreyögg; Markus M Grabka
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2009-09-16

5.  Hospital utilization and the health care system.

Authors:  M I Roemer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The effects of Medicaid policy changes on adults' service use patterns in Kentucky and Idaho.

Authors:  James Marton; Genevieve M Kenney; Jennifer E Pelletier; Jeffery Talbert; Ariel Klein
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2013-02-01

7.  Consumer problems with prepaid health plans in California; implications for serving medicaid recipients through health maintenance organizations.

Authors:  C N D'Onofrio; P D Mullen
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 8.  Balancing primary versus specialty care.

Authors:  L Shi
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Primary health care and hospitalization: California and Cuba.

Authors:  M I Roemer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  A co-payment for consultant services: primary care physicians' referral actualization.

Authors:  Daniel A Vardy; Tami Freud; Michael Sherf; Ofer Spilberg; Dan Goldfarb; Arnon D Cohen; Shlomo Mor-Yosef; Pesach Shvartzman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.