Literature DB >> 19756797

Copayments for ambulatory care in Germany: a natural experiment using a difference-in-difference approach.

Jonas Schreyögg1, Markus M Grabka.   

Abstract

In response to increasing health expenditures and a high number of physician visits, the German government introduced a copayment for ambulatory care in 2004 for individuals with statutory health insurance (SHI). Because persons with private insurance were exempt from the copayments, this health-care reform can be regarded as a natural experiment. We used a difference-in-difference approach to examine whether the new copayment effectively reduced the overall demand for physician visits and to explore whether it acted as a deterrent to vulnerable groups, such as those with low income or chronic conditions. We found that there was no significant reduction in the number of physician visits among SHI members compared to our control group. At the same time, we did not observe a deterrent effect among vulnerable individuals. Thus, the copayment has failed to reduce the demand for physician visits. It is likely that this result is due to the design of the copayment scheme, as the copayment is low and is paid only for the first physician visit per quarter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19756797     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-009-0179-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  12 in total

1.  Copayments for ambulatory care: penny-wise and pound-foolish.

Authors:  M I Roemer; C E Hopkins; L Carr; F Gartside
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Co-payments for prescription drugs and the demand for doctor visits--evidence from a natural experiment.

Authors:  Rainer Winkelmann
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  The effect of a major cigarette price change on smoking behavior in california: a zero-inflated negative binomial model.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Sheu; Teh-Wei Hu; Theodore E Keeler; Michael Ong; Hai-Yen Sung
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  A DID analysis of the impact of health insurance reform in the city of Hangzhou.

Authors:  Jiale Zhang
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Utilization of publicly insured health services in Saskatchewan before, during and after copayment.

Authors:  R G Beck; J M Horne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  [The impact of co-payments on patient behavior: evidence from a natural experiment].

Authors:  Markus M Grabka; Jonas Schreyögg; Reinhard Busse
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2006-06-15

7.  The effect of office visit copayments on preventive care services in an HMO.

Authors:  D C Cherkin; L Grothaus; E H Wagner
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.730

8.  Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment.

Authors:  W G Manning; J P Newhouse; N Duan; E B Keeler; A Leibowitz; M S Marquis
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  1987-06

9.  Patient charges--a hindrance to financially and psychosocially disadvantage groups seeking care.

Authors:  S Elofsson; A L Undén; I Krakau
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Are German patients burdened by the practice charge for physician visits ('Praxisgebuehr')? A cross sectional analysis of socio-economic and health related factors.

Authors:  Ina-Maria Rückert; Jan Böcken; Andreas Mielck
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  14 in total

1.  Preferences for health insurance and health status: does it matter whether you are Dutch or German?

Authors:  Janet MacNeil Vroomen; Peter Zweifel
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-05-06

Review 2.  How does copayment for health care services affect demand, health and redistribution? A systematic review of the empirical evidence from 1990 to 2011.

Authors:  Astrid Kiil; Kurt Houlberg
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-08-29

3.  Assessing the effectiveness of health care cost containment measures: evidence from the market for rehabilitation care.

Authors:  Nicolas R Ziebarth
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2013-12-04

4.  A systematic review of strategies used for controlling consumer moral hazard in health systems.

Authors:  Zohreh Koohi Rostamkalaee; Mehdi Jafari; Hasan Abolghasem Gorji
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 5.  Empirical models of demand for out-patient physician services and their relevance to the assessment of patient payment policies: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Olga Skriabikova; Milena Pavlova; Wim Groot
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Forgone care and financial burden due to out-of-pocket payments within the German health care system.

Authors:  Patrick Bremer
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2014-12-20

7.  An evaluation on the effect of the copayment waiver policy for Korean hospitalized children under the age of six.

Authors:  Sook Young Kwak; Seok-Jun Yoon; In-Hwan Oh; Young-Eun Kim
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The effect of cost-sharing in private health insurance on the utilization of health care services between private insurance purchasers and non-purchasers: a study of the Korean health panel survey (2008-2012).

Authors:  Young Choi; Jae-Hyun Kim; Ki-Bong Yoo; Kyoung Hee Cho; Jae-Woo Choi; Tae Hoon Lee; Woorim Kim; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Body weight changes and outpatient medical care utilisation: Results of the MONICA/KORA cohorts S3/F3 and S4/F4.

Authors:  Silke B Wolfenstetter; Petra Menn; Rolf Holle; Andreas Mielck; Christa Meisinger; Thomas von Lengerke
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2012-10-25

10.  Direct costs of inequalities in health care utilization in Germany 1994 to 2009: a top-down projection.

Authors:  Lars Eric Kroll; Thomas Lampert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.