Literature DB >> 12905051

Service sector and perceived social support at work in Norwegian nurses' aides.

Willy Eriksen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Social support at work is associated with reduced risk of illness and sickness absence. Identifying determinants of social support at work is, hence, important. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between service sector and level of social support at work in nurses' aides.
METHODS: A random sample of nurses' aides, organised by the Norwegian Union of Health-and Social Workers, was mailed a questionnaire in 1999. Of 12,000 recipients, 7,478 (62.3%) completed the questionnaire. The 6,234 vocationally active, female respondents comprised the sample of this study. Perceived social support at work was assessed by scales in the standardised questionnaire, the General Nordic Questionnaire for Psychological and Social Factors at Work (QPSNordic). Each service sector was compared with all other sectors. Because of multiple comparisons, the significance level was set at 0.01, and 99% confidence intervals were used.
RESULTS: The following associations were found, after adjustments for age and work schedule: high levels of support from the immediate superior were reported more often by aides in the psychiatric sector [odds ratio (OR) 1.72; 99% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-2.29] and community-nurse service (OR 1.22; CI 1.01-1.48), and less often by aides in nursing homes (OR 0.67; CI 0.58-0.77). Encouraging and supportive culture in the work unit was reported more often by aides in the psychiatric sector (OR 1.55; CI 1.13-2.13), and less often by aides in nursing homes (OR 0.79; CI 0.69-0.92).
CONCLUSIONS: In nurses' aides, perceived level of social support at work varies with service sector. Differences in organisational structure, personnel resources, and work tasks could explain the results. It is essential that managers in nursing homes put more emphasis on creating a supportive culture in their work units. Reorganisation and training of personnel could be elements of this effort. Higher grants may also be needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12905051     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-003-0447-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  9 in total

1.  Job strain and evolution of mental health among nurses.

Authors:  R Bourbonnais; M Comeau; M Vézina
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  1999-04

2.  Work factors as predictors of sickness absence: a three month prospective study of nurses' aides.

Authors:  W Eriksen; D Bruusgaard; S Knardahl
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Physical leisure-time activities and long-term sick leave: a 15-month prospective study of nurses' aides.

Authors:  Willy Eriksen; Dag Bruusgaard
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 4.  Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain.

Authors:  W E Hoogendoorn; M N van Poppel; P M Bongers; B W Koes; L M Bouter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics.

Authors:  R Karasek; C Brisson; N Kawakami; I Houtman; P Bongers; B Amick
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  1998-10

6.  What's so unhealthy about hostility? Construct validity and psychosocial correlates of the Cook and Medley Ho scale.

Authors:  T W Smith; K D Frohm
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Type A and social support.

Authors:  D J Lynch; K Schaffer
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.104

8.  Social relationships and health.

Authors:  J S House; K R Landis; D Umberson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Psychosocial work environment and sickness absence among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  F M North; S L Syme; A Feeney; M Shipley; M Marmot
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.308

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Practice area and work demands in nurses' aides: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Willy Eriksen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  "Blue flags", development of a short clinical questionnaire on work-related psychosocial risk factors - a validation study in primary care.

Authors:  Charlotte Post Sennehed; Gunvor Gard; Sara Holmberg; Kjerstin Stigmar; Malin Forsbrand; Birgitta Grahn
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  The Association between Quality Improvement Initiatives in Dementia Care and Supportive Psychosocial Work Environments in Nursing Homes.

Authors:  Miharu Nakanishi; Maki Tei-Tominaga
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.