Literature DB >> 10954300

Calcium stone fragility is predicted by helical CT attenuation values.

K C Saw1, J A McAteer, N S Fineberg, A G Monga, G T Chua, J E Lingeman, J C Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Helical CT has become the preferred method for imaging urinary calculi, and so it would be useful if data from helical CT could also be used to predict the number of shockwaves (SWs) needed to break a given stone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We measured the number of SWs required to comminute calcium stones in vitro.
RESULTS: The SW requirement correlated with stone size (volume, weight, diameter) and with helical CT attenuation values when the scans were performed at 3-mm collimation. When CT scans were performed at 1-mm collimation, the number of SWs needed for comminution did not correlate with helical CT attenuation values. This result indicates that the correlation with 3-mm scans was attributable to volume-averaging effects, in which smaller stones yield smaller attenuation values. That is, attenuation values from helical CT at larger beam collimation widths contain information about stone size that can be exploited to predict the fragility of calcium stones. We observed that for calcium stones, the number of SWs to comminution was generally less than half the stone CT attenuation value in Hounsfield units. This "half-attenuation rule" predicted the number of SWs needed to complete fragmentation for 95% of calcium stones (24/24 calcium oxalate monohydrate, 13/13 hydroxyapatite, 8/10 brushite stones).
CONCLUSION: This in vitro study suggests that it may be possible to predict effective SW dose using helical CT prior to lithotripsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10954300     DOI: 10.1089/end.2000.14.471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  16 in total

1.  Clinical factors prolonging the operative time of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones: a single-center analysis.

Authors:  Hiroki Ito; Shinnosuke Kuroda; Takashi Kawahara; Kazuhide Makiyama; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  The hounsfield unit value calculated with the aid of non-contrast computed tomography and its effect on the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Alper Gok; Haci Polat; Ali Cift; Mehmet Ozgur Yucel; Bahri Gok; Mehmet Sirik; Can Benlioglu; Bedreddin Kalyenci
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Joshua D Wiesenthal; Daniela Ghiculete; R John D'A Honey; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-13

Review 4.  Recent advances in lithotripsy technology and treatment strategies: A systematic review update.

Authors:  H E Elmansy; J E Lingeman
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 5.  Strategies to optimize shock wave lithotripsy outcome: Patient selection and treatment parameters.

Authors:  Michelle Jo Semins; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-06

6.  The treatment of lower pole renal calculi in 2003.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

7.  Can the CT planning image determine whether a kidney stone is radiopaque on a plain KUB?

Authors:  Ole Graumann; Susanne S Osther; Diana Spasojevic; Palle J S Osther
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-08-18

8.  Correlative investigation between routine clinical parameters of dual-energy computed tomography and the outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children with urolithiasis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Beiwu Tu; Jianye Jia; Lengwei Yu; Huimin Li; Dengbin Wang
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-06-10

9.  Outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones according to ESWL intensity.

Authors:  Ji Hyung Yoon; Sejun Park; Seong Cheol Kim; Sungchan Park; Kyung Hyun Moon; Sang Hyeon Cheon; Taekmin Kwon
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-04

10.  CT visible internal stone structure, but not Hounsfield unit value, of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragility in vitro.

Authors:  Chad A Zarse; Tariq A Hameed; Molly E Jackson; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; James C Williams
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.