CONTEXT: Excessive ground reaction force when landing from a jump may result in lower extremity injuries. It is important to better understand how feedback can influence ground reaction force (GRF) and potentially reduce injury risk. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of expert-provided (EP), self-analysis (SA), and combination EP and SA (combo) feedback on reducing peak vertical GRF during a jump-landing task. DATA SOURCES: We searched the Web of Science database on July 1, 2011; using the search terms ground reaction force, landing biomechanics, and feedback elicited 731 initial hits. STUDY SELECTION: Of the 731 initial hits, our final analysis included 7 studies that incorporated 32 separate data comparisons. DATA EXTRACTION: Standardized effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated between pretest and posttest scores for each feedback condition. DATA SYNTHESIS: We found a homogeneous beneficial effect for combo feedback, indicating a reduction in GRF with no CIs crossing zero. We also found a homogeneous beneficial effect for EP feedback, but the CIs from 4 of the 10 data comparisons crossed zero. The SA feedback showed strong, definitive effects when the intervention included a videotape SA, with no CIs crossing zero. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 7 studies reviewed, combo feedback seemed to produce the greatest decrease in peak vertical GRF during a jump-landing task.
CONTEXT: Excessive ground reaction force when landing from a jump may result in lower extremity injuries. It is important to better understand how feedback can influence ground reaction force (GRF) and potentially reduce injury risk. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of expert-provided (EP), self-analysis (SA), and combination EP and SA (combo) feedback on reducing peak vertical GRF during a jump-landing task. DATA SOURCES: We searched the Web of Science database on July 1, 2011; using the search terms ground reaction force, landing biomechanics, and feedback elicited 731 initial hits. STUDY SELECTION: Of the 731 initial hits, our final analysis included 7 studies that incorporated 32 separate data comparisons. DATA EXTRACTION: Standardized effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated between pretest and posttest scores for each feedback condition. DATA SYNTHESIS: We found a homogeneous beneficial effect for combo feedback, indicating a reduction in GRF with no CIs crossing zero. We also found a homogeneous beneficial effect for EP feedback, but the CIs from 4 of the 10 data comparisons crossed zero. The SA feedback showed strong, definitive effects when the intervention included a videotape SA, with no CIs crossing zero. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 7 studies reviewed, combo feedback seemed to produce the greatest decrease in peak vertical GRF during a jump-landing task.
Authors: Timothy E Hewett; Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Robert S Heidt; Angelo J Colosimo; Scott G McLean; Antonie J van den Bogert; Mark V Paterno; Paul Succop Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2005-02-08 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: James A Oñate; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Stephen W Marshall; Carol Giuliani; Bing Yu; William E Garrett Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2005-04-12 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Daniel C Herman; James A Oñate; Paul S Weinhold; Kevin M Guskiewicz; William E Garrett; Bing Yu; Darin A Padua Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: R B Frobell; H P Roos; E M Roos; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; R Buck; J Tamez-Pena; S Totterman; T Boegard; L S Lohmander Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Steven J Pfeiffer; Jeffrey T Spang; Daniel Nissman; David Lalush; Kyle Wallace; Matthew S Harkey; Laura S Pietrosimone; Darin Padua; Troy Blackburn; Brian Pietrosimone Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-07-21