Literature DB >> 9421865

Stress fractures in female athletes. Diagnosis, management and rehabilitation.

P Brukner1, K Bennell.   

Abstract

Stress fractures are a common overuse injury among athletes. The incidence of stress fractures among females is higher in the military, but this difference is not as evident in the athletic population. The history of the patient with stress fracture is typically one of insidious onset of activity-related pain. If the patient continues to exercise, the pain may well become more severe or occur at an earlier stage of exercise. As well as obtaining a history of the patient's pain and its relation to exercise, it is important to determine the presence of predisposing factors. On physical examination, the most obvious feature is localised bony tenderness. Occasionally, redness, swelling or periosteal thickening may be present at the site of the stress fracture. The diagnosis of stress fracture is primarily a clinical one; however, if the diagnosis is uncertain, various imaging techniques can be used to confirm the diagnosis. In the majority of stress fractures, there is no obvious abnormality on plain radiograph. Although the triple phase bone radiograph is extremely sensitive, the fracture itself is not visualised and it may be difficult to precisely locate the site, especially in the foot. The radionuclide scan will detect evolving stress fractures at the stage of accelerated remodelling, so the findings must be closely correlated with the clinical picture. The characteristic bone scan appearance of a stress fracture is of a sharply marginated area of increased uptake, usually involving one cortex of the bone. Computerised tomography scanning is a helpful addition if the fracture needs to be visualised, or to distinguish between a stress reaction and stress fracture. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is being used increasingly as the investigation of choice for stress fractures. The typical findings on MRI are of periosteal and marrow oedema, as well as fracture line. The basis of treatment of a stress fracture involves rest from the aggravating activity. Most stress fractures will heal in a straightforward manner, and return to sport occurs within 6 to 8 weeks. The rate of resumption of activity should be influenced by symptoms and physical findings. When free of pain, the aggravating activity can be resumed and slowly increased. It is important that the athlete with a stress fracture maintain fitness during this period of rehabilitation. The most commonly used methods are cycling, swimming, upper body weights and water running. There are a number of specific stress fractures that require additional treatment because of a tendency to develop delayed union or nonunion. These include stress fractures of the neck of the femur, anterior cortex of the tibia, navicular and second and fifth metatarsals. An essential component of the management of stress fractures, as with any overuse injury, involves identification of the factors that have contributed to the injury and, where possible, correction or modification of some of these factors to reduce the risk of the injury recurring. Stress fractures are more common in female athletes with menstrual disturbances. This may be due to the effect on bone density. The role of hormonal replacement in the management of these athletes is unclear at this stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9421865     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199724060-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  52 in total

1.  Stress fractures in men and women undergoing military training.

Authors:  R R Protzman; C G Griffis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Femoral neck stress fractures.

Authors:  L R Fullerton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The incidence and distribution of stress fractures in competitive track and field athletes. A twelve-month prospective study.

Authors:  K L Bennell; S A Malcolm; S A Thomas; J D Wark; P D Brukner
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Three-phase radionuclide bone imaging in sports medicine.

Authors:  H D Rupani; L E Holder; D A Espinola; S I Engin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Exercise-induced amenorrhea and bone density.

Authors:  J S Lindberg; W B Fears; M M Hunt; M R Powell; D Boll; C E Wade
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Stress fractures of the femoral shaft in athletes--more common than expected. A new clinical test.

Authors:  A W Johnson; C B Weiss; D L Wheeler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Overuse ballet injury of the base of the second metatarsal. A diagnostic problem.

Authors:  T Harrington; K J Crichton; I F Anderson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Tarsal navicular stress fracture in athletes.

Authors:  K M Khan; P D Brukner; C Kearney; P J Fuller; C J Bradshaw; Z S Kiss
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Bone stress: a radionuclide imaging perspective.

Authors:  L W Roub; L W Gumerman; E N Hanley; M W Clark; M Goodman; D L Herbert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Stress fractures of the second metatarsal involving Lisfranc's joint in ballet dancers. A new overuse injury of the foot.

Authors:  L J Micheli; R S Sohn; R Solomon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  [Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bone. Causality, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis].

Authors:  G M Ivanic; T Juranitsch; M S Myerson; H J Trnka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  In brief: fractures in brief: femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Joseph Bernstein; Jaimo Ahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Lower extremity and pelvic stress fractures in athletes.

Authors:  S Y Liong; R W Whitehouse
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Female Athlete Triad: Future Directions for Energy Availability and Eating Disorder Research and Practice.

Authors:  Nancy I Williams; Siobhan M Statuta; Ashley Austin
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.182

5.  Decreasing landing forces: effect of instruction.

Authors:  P J McNair; H Prapavessis; K Callender
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of subchondral insufficiency fractures of the lower limb.

Authors:  Sangoh Lee; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Exercise during energy restriction mitigates bone loss but not alterations in estrogen status or metabolic hormones.

Authors:  C E Metzger; K Baek; S N Swift; M J De Souza; S A Bloomfield
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Pelvic stress injuries in the athlete: management and prevention.

Authors:  Christine Miller; Nancy Major; Alison Toth
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Traumatic spondylolysis in a heptathlete: a case history and review.

Authors:  Fleur Castlereagh; Henry Pollard
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2005

10.  Sacral stress fracture in a female collegiate distance runner: a case report.

Authors:  D Klossner
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.