Literature DB >> 10952210

Transposable elements as the key to a 21st century view of evolution.

J A Shapiro1.   

Abstract

Cells are capable of sophisticated information processing. Cellular signal transduction networks serve to compute data from multiple inputs and make decisions about cellular behavior. Genomes are organized like integrated computer programs as systems of routines and subroutines, not as a collection of independent genetic 'units'. DNA sequences which do not code for protein structure determine the system architecture of the genome. Repetitive DNA elements serve as tags to mark and integrate different protein coding sequences into coordinately functioning groups, to build up systems for genome replication and distribution to daughter cells, and to organize chromatin. Genomes can be reorganized through the action of cellular systems for cutting, splicing and rearranging DNA molecules. Natural genetic engineering systems (including transposable elements) are capable of acting genome-wide and not just one site at a time. Transposable elements are subject to regulation by cellular signal transduction/computing networks. This regulation acts on both the timing and extent of DNA rearrangements and (in a few documented cases so far) on the location of changes in the genomes. By connecting transcriptional regulatory circuits to the action of natural genetic engineering systems, there is a plausible molecular basis for coordinated changes in the genome subject to biologically meaningful feedback.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10952210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  24 in total

1.  Transposons but not retrotransposons are located preferentially in regions of high recombination rate in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  L Duret; G Marais; C Biémont
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Recombination rate and the distribution of transposable elements in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Carène Rizzon; Gabriel Marais; Manolo Gouy; Christian Biémont
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Estimating the fitness effect of an insertion sequence.

Authors:  Manuel Bichsel; A D Barbour; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Positive selection on transposase genes of insertion sequences in the Crocosphaera watsonii genome.

Authors:  Ted H M Mes; Marije Doeleman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Forced evolution in silico by artificial transposons and their genetic operators: The ant navigation problem.

Authors:  Leonid Zamdborg; David M Holloway; Juan J Merelo; Vladimir F Levchenko; Alexander V Spirov
Journal:  Inf Sci (N Y)       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 6.795

6.  A 21(st) Century View of Evolution.

Authors:  J A Shapiro
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.365

7.  Genetic diversity among barley cultivars assessed by sequence-specific amplification polymorphism.

Authors:  V D Soleimani; B R Baum; D A Johnson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Evolutionary Design of Gene Networks: Forced Evolution by Genomic Parasites.

Authors:  A V Spirov; E A Zagriychuk; D M Holloway
Journal:  Parallel Process Lett       Date:  2014-06

9.  Genomic distribution of retrotransposons 297, 1731, copia, mdg1 and roo in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.

Authors:  Julia Díaz-González; Ana Domínguez; Jesús Albornoz
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Sequence divergence within transposable element families in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Lerat; Carène Rizzon; Christian Biémont
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.