Literature DB >> 22252506

Estimating the fitness effect of an insertion sequence.

Manuel Bichsel1, A D Barbour, Andreas Wagner.   

Abstract

Since its discovery, mobile DNA has fascinated researchers. In particular, many researchers have debated why insertion sequences persist in prokaryote genomes and populations. While some authors think that insertion sequences persist only because of occasional beneficial effects they have on their hosts, others argue that horizontal gene transfer is strong enough to overcome their generally detrimental effects. In this study, we model the long-term fate of a prokaryote cell population, of which a small proportion of cells has been infected with one insertion sequence per cell. Based on our model and the distribution of IS5, an insertion sequence for which sufficient data is available in 525 fully sequenced proteobacterial genomes, we show that the fitness cost of insertion sequences is so small that they are effectively neutral or only slightly detrimental. We also show that an insertion sequence infection can persist and reach the empirically observed distribution if the rate of horizontal gene transfer is at least as large as the fitness cost, and that this rate is well within the rates of horizontal gene transfer observed in nature. In addition, we show that the time needed to reach the observed prevalence of IS5 is unrealistically long for the fitness cost and horizontal gene transfer rate that we computed. Occasional beneficial effects may thus have played an important role in the fast spreading of insertion sequences like IS5.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22252506     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-012-0504-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  21 in total

1.  Transposable elements as the key to a 21st century view of evolution.

Authors:  J A Shapiro
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Sure facts, speculations, and open questions about the evolution of transposable element copy number.

Authors:  S V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Transposable elements as activators of cryptic genes in E. coli.

Authors:  B G Hall
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 4.  Escherichia coli in disguise: molecular origins of Shigella.

Authors:  Ruiting Lan; Peter R Reeves
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.700

5.  Gene transfer by transduction in the marine environment.

Authors:  S C Jiang; J H Paul
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Natural transformation in river epilithon.

Authors:  H G Williams; M J Day; J C Fry; G J Stewart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Transposable elements and adaptation of host bacteria.

Authors:  M Blot
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution.

Authors:  W F Doolittle; C Sapienza
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-04-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite.

Authors:  L E Orgel; F H Crick
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-04-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Estimates of the overall rate of growth of the intestinal microflora of hamsters, guinea pigs, and mice.

Authors:  R J Gibbons; B Kapsimalis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  10 in total

1.  Disentangling the effects of selection and loss bias on gene dynamics.

Authors:  Jaime Iranzo; José A Cuesta; Susanna Manrubia; Mikhail I Katsnelson; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Birth, death, and diversification of mobile promoters in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Mark W J van Passel; Harm Nijveen; Lindi M Wahl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Phylogenetic background and habitat drive the genetic diversification of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Marie Touchon; Amandine Perrin; Jorge André Moura de Sousa; Belinda Vangchhia; Samantha Burn; Claire L O'Brien; Erick Denamur; David Gordon; Eduardo Pc Rocha
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  Dynamics of bacterial insertion sequences: can transposition bursts help the elements persist?

Authors:  Yue Wu; Richard Z Aandahl; Mark M Tanaka
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Discovering Complete Quasispecies in Bacterial Genomes.

Authors:  Frederic Bertels; Chaitanya S Gokhale; Arne Traulsen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Identification and Characterization of Domesticated Bacterial Transposases.

Authors:  Frederic Bertels; Jenna Gallie; Paul B Rainey
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  How sequence populations persist inside bacterial genomes.

Authors:  Hye Jin Park; Chaitanya S Gokhale; Frederic Bertels
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Bacterial Adaptation by a Transposition Burst of an Invading IS Element.

Authors:  Scott R Miller; Heidi E Abresch; Nikea J Ulrich; Emiko B Sano; Andrew H Demaree; Andrew R Oman; Arkadiy I Garber
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Large-scale genomic analysis suggests a neutral punctuated dynamics of transposable elements in bacterial genomes.

Authors:  Jaime Iranzo; Manuel J Gómez; Francisco J López de Saro; Susanna Manrubia
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Inevitability of Genetic Parasites.

Authors:  Jaime Iranzo; Pere Puigbò; Alexander E Lobkovsky; Yuri I Wolf; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.416

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.