Literature DB >> 10951466

Determinants of parental decisions after the prenatal diagnosis of down syndrome: bringing in context.

D W Britt1, S T Risinger, V Miller, M K Mans, E L Krivchenia, M I Evans.   

Abstract

This article develops the concept of decision context to refer to the combinations of factors that are important in understanding and predicting termination decisions after a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21. Four factors are examined: maternal age, gestational age, prior voluntary abortion, and existing children. The cases were studied at the Wayne State University's Reproductive Genetics Clinic. Qualitative comparative analysis, a technique specifically designed for examining the impact of combinations of factors, is used to isolate influential decision contexts. Odds and odds ratios are used to pinpoint outcome differences among different decision contexts. Four alternative decision contexts are especially conducive to choosing to terminate a pregnancy. Two of these involve women of any age and are formed from combinations of gestational age and existing children (existing children and low gestational age, and no children combined with late gestational age). Older women who have not had an abortion and who discover the trisomy 21 anomaly early are likely to choose termination. Younger women who have had an abortion are also likely to choose termination. Our data suggest there are added layers of complexity to patients' decisions that derive from combinations of conditions. An additional, strong implication is that qualitative comparative analysis may be particularly useful in understanding such complexity. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10951466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  7 in total

1.  Variables influencing pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Anne Hawkins; Ana Stenzel; Joanne Taylor; Valerie Y Chock; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A Hierarchical Bayes Approach to Modeling Heterogeneity in Discrete Choice Experiments: An Application to Public Preferences for Prenatal Screening.

Authors:  Tima Mohammadi; Wei Zhang; Julie Sou; Sylvie Langlois; Sarah Munro; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing Decision-Making after Prenatal Diagnosis of down Syndrome.

Authors:  Amy R Reed; Kathryn L Berrier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Trends in survival among children with Down syndrome in 10 regions of the United States.

Authors:  James E Kucik; Mikyong Shin; Csaba Siffel; Lisa Marengo; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Parental decisions following prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities: implications for genetic counseling practice in Japan.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Suzumori; Kyoko Kumagai; Shinobu Goto; Akira Nakamura; Mayumi Sugiura-Ogasawara
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Understanding False Negative in Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Mark I Evans; Ming Chen; David W Britt
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17

7.  Complexity of consenting for medical termination of pregnancy: prospective and longitudinal study in Paris.

Authors:  Georges Abi Tayeh; Jean-Marie Jouannic; Fersan Mansour; Assaad Kesrouani; Elie Attieh
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.