Literature DB >> 10947618

Quality of processed blood for autotransfusion.

G Shulman1.   

Abstract

Centrifugal red blood cell washers for intraoperative autotransfusion process shed blood during surgery. In this study, the quality of processed fresh, human bank blood was assessed in a standardized laboratory setting during standard, medium, and high flow processing. Red cell recovery rates and plasma washout efficiencies were compared using three different devices. The accurate parameters measuring effectiveness and product quality were red cell mass (RCM) flow rate and the plasma washout efficiency. Cobe BRAT 2, a system with discontinuous flow (DF) and a cylindrical centrifuge bowl, permitted processing in standard and medium flow of 26 and 35 mL RCM/min, respectively, with washout of residual plasma albumin of 93.2 and 91.2%. The Medtronic Sequestra 1000, a DF system with a conical centrifuge bowl processed blood at 15 and 23 mL RCM/min and eliminated plasma albumin with 98.4 and 96.8% washout during standard and medium flow, respectively, with significant red cell loss occurring during medium flow. The respective speeds of high-flow programs with BRAT 2 and Sequestra 1000 were 15 and 22 mL RCM/min, related to a hematocrit in the holding bag, less than that of the incoming blood from the reservoir. Washout was 58.2 and 58.3%, respectively. Fresenius CATS, a continuous flow (CF) device, produced flow rates of 19, 24, and 43 mL RCM/min and plasma albumin elimination of 97.8, 94.4, and 93.3% in standard, medium, and high-flow, respectively. Holding bag hematocrits with CF exceeded that of DF. Standard, medium, and high-flow programs of CATS may be used without restriction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10947618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  6 in total

1.  Autologous versus allogeneic transfusion in aortic surgery: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Julian C L Wong; Francesco Torella; Sarah L Haynes; Kirsteen Dalrymple; Andrew J Mortimer; Charles N McCollum
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Laboratory characteristics and clinical utility of post-operative cell salvage: washed or unwashed blood transfusion?

Authors:  Manuel Muñoz; Robert Slappendel; Dafydd Thomas
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  In Vitro Evaluation of the Fresenius Kabi CATSmart Autotransfusion System.

Authors:  Melissa Alberts; Robert C Groom; Richard Walczak; Robert Kramer; Adrienne Karpiel; Jeanette Dieter; Lisa Sheth; Nathaniel H Greene; Edmund H Jooste
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2017-06

4.  Influence of the washing program on the blood processing performance of a continuous autotransfusion device.

Authors:  Chiyul Yoon; Seungwoo Noh; Jung Chan Lee; Sung Ho Ko; Wonsik Ahn; Hee Chan Kim
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 1.731

5.  Bedside Allogeneic Erythrocyte Washing with a Cell Saver to Remove Cytokines, Chemokines, and Cell-derived Microvesicles.

Authors:  Ian J Welsby; Philip J Norris; William J Mauermann; Mihai V Podgoreanu; Chelsea M Conn; Laurie Meade; Tamara Cannon; Sheila M Keating; Christopher C Silliman; Marguerite Kehler; Phillip J Schulte; Daryl J Kor
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 6.  Intraoperative blood salvage in vascular surgery - worth the effort?

Authors:  Julie Ann Freischlag
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 9.097

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.