Literature DB >> 10946722

Attention and luminance detection: effects of cues, masks, and pedestals.

P L Smith1.   

Abstract

Three experiments investigated the effects of attention on the detection of luminance targets in a spatial-cuing paradigm. Gabor patch stimuli of 30, 60, or 90 ms duration, equated for detectability, were presented (a) against a uniform field with a checkerboard backward mask, (b) atop a 15% luminance pedestal with a backward mask, or (c) atop a luminance pedestal with no backward mask. Signal detection analysis showed that detection sensitivity was significantly enhanced at attended locations for all observers when backward masks were used, both when targets were presented against a uniform field and when a pedestal was used. However, when no masks were used there was no cuing advantage of any kind. The results show that the cuing effect in simple detection depends on the use of backward masks, a finding that resolves the inconsistencies previously associated with studies of this type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10946722     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.4.1401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  16 in total

1.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing.

Authors:  M Carrasco; B McElree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement.

Authors:  M Carrasco; C Penpeci-Talgar; M Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Equality judgments cannot distinguish between attention effects on appearance and criterion: a reply to Schneider (2011).

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Jared Abrams; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  On the flexibility of sustained attention and its effects on a texture segmentation task.

Authors:  Yaffa Yeshurun; Barbara Montagna; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Combining spatial and temporal expectations to improve visual perception.

Authors:  Gustavo Rohenkohl; Ian C Gould; Jéssica Pessoa; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Information processing bottlenecks in macaque posterior parietal cortex: an attentional blink?

Authors:  Ryan T Maloney; Jaikishan Jayakumar; Ekaterina V Levichkina; Ivan N Pigarev; Trichur R Vidyasagar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Attention trades off spatial acuity.

Authors:  Barbara Montagna; Franco Pestilli; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Intra- and cross-modal cuing of spatial attention: Time courses and mechanisms.

Authors:  Zhong-Lin Lu; Hennis Chi-Hang Tse; Barbara Anne Dosher; Luis A Lesmes; Christian Posner; Wilson Chu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Transient attention does increase perceived contrast of suprathreshold stimuli: a reply to Prinzmetal, Long, and Leonhardt (2008).

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Stuart Fuller; Sam Ling
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.