Literature DB >> 10946385

Mass screening in low-income populations: the challenges of securing diagnostic and treatment services in a national cancer screening program.

P M Lantz1, L C Richardson, L E Sever, D J Macklem, M L Hare, C E Orians, R Henson.   

Abstract

Funding for many mass screening programs for low-income and uninsured populations provides resources for screening tests, yet only rarely does it provide coverage for necessary follow-up diagnostic and treatment services. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP), a federally funded initiative that provides cancer screening to low-income uninsured and underinsured women, covers some diagnostic follow-up tests and no treatment services. We conducted in-depth case studies of seven state programs participating in the NBCCEDP to investigate the strategies and approaches being used to secure diagnostic and treatment services. The results suggest that the program relies on a patchwork of resources--at state and local levels--to provide diagnostic and treatment services. This includes a number of components of local safety nets, all of which are unstable and have uncertain futures. Public health disease-screening initiatives need to reconsider the feasibility of continued reliance on case-by-case appeals to the local safety net for diagnostic follow-up and treatment services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10946385     DOI: 10.1215/03616878-25-3-451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  10 in total

1.  Assessing local capacity to expand rural breast cancer screening and patient navigation: An iterative mixed-method tool.

Authors:  Stephen J Inrig; Robin T Higashi; Jasmin A Tiro; Keith E Argenbright; Simon J Craddock Lee
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2016-11-23

2.  Timeliness of cervical cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Vicki B Benard; William Howe; Janet Royalty; William Helsel; William Kammerer; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1996-2005.

Authors:  Lisa C Richardson; Janet Royalty; William Howe; William Helsel; William Kammerer; Vicki B Benard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  From cancer screening to treatment: service delivery and referral in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Vivien Hanson; Gale D Johnson; Janet E Royalty; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Implementation of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: the beginning.

Authors:  Nancy C Lee; Faye L Wong; Patricia M Jamison; Sandra F Jones; Louise Galaska; Kevin T Brady; Barbara Wethers; George-Ann Stokes-Townsend
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Lack of follow-up of prostate-specific antigen test results.

Authors:  Stephanie L McFall; David W Smith
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Implementing low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Canada: implications of alternative at-risk populations, screening frequency, and duration.

Authors:  W K Evans; W M Flanagan; A B Miller; J R Goffin; S Memon; N Fitzgerald; M C Wolfson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 8.  Chemoprevention of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Eva Szabo; Jenny T Mao; Stephen Lam; Mary E Reid; Robert L Keith
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Assessing the implementation of a patient navigation intervention for colonoscopy screening.

Authors:  Amy DeGroff; Lindsay Gressard; Rebecca Glover-Kudon; Ketra Rice; Felicia Solomon Tharpe; Cam Escoffery; Joanne Gersten; Lynn Butterly
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Facilitators and challenges to start-up of the colorectal cancer screening demonstration program.

Authors:  Amy DeGroff; Jennifer Boehm; Sonya Goode Green; Debra Holden; Laura C Seeff
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.