Literature DB >> 10944335

The high-mosaicity illusion: revealing the true physical characteristics of macromolecular crystals.

H D Bellamy1, E H Snell, J Lovelace, M Pokross, G E Borgstahl.   

Abstract

Typical measurements of macromolecular crystal mosaicity are dominated by the characteristics of the X-ray beam and as a result the mosaicity value given during data processing can be an artifact of the instrumentation rather than the sample. For physical characterization of crystals, an experimental system and software have been developed to simultaneously measure the diffraction resolution and mosaic spread of macromolecular crystals. The contributions of the X-ray beam to the reflection angular widths were minimized by using a highly parallel, highly monochromatic synchrotron source. Hundreds of reflection profiles over a wide resolution range were rapidly measured using a charge-coupled device (CCD) area detector in combination with superfine phi-slicing data collection. The Lorentz effect and beam contributions were evaluated and deconvoluted from the recorded data. Data collection and processing is described. From 1 degrees of superfine phi-slice data collected on a crystal of manganese superoxide dismutase, the mosaicities of 260 reflections were measured. The average mosaicity was 0.0101 degrees (s.d. 0.0035 degrees ) measured as the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) and ranged from 0.0011 to 0. 0188 degrees. Each reflection profile was individually fitted with two Gaussian profiles, with the first Gaussian contributing 55% (s.d. 9%) and the second contributing 35% (s.d. 9%) of the reflection. On average, the deconvoluted width of the first Gaussian was 0.0054 degrees (s.d. 0.0015 degrees ) and the second was 0.0061 degrees (s. d. 0.0023 degrees ). The mosaicity of the crystal was anisotropic, with FWHM values of 0.0068, 0.0140 and 0.0046 degrees along the a, b and c axes, respectively. The anisotropic mosaicity analysis indicates that the crystal is most perfect in the direction that corresponds to the favored growth direction of the crystal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10944335     DOI: 10.1107/s0907444900007356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr        ISSN: 0907-4449


  9 in total

1.  Effect of leucine-to-methionine substitutions on the diffraction quality of histone chaperone SET/TAF-Ibeta/INHAT crystals.

Authors:  Miki Senda; Shinsuke Muto; Masami Horikoshi; Toshiya Senda
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2008-09-30

2.  Dramatic improvement of crystal quality for low-temperature-grown rabbit muscle aldolase.

Authors:  Hajeung Park; Erumbi S Rangarajan; Jurgen Sygusch; Tina Izard
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2010-04-30

Review 3.  Correlated Motions in Structural Biology.

Authors:  Da Xu; Steve P Meisburger; Nozomi Ando
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.321

Review 4.  XFEL diffraction: developing processing methods to optimize data quality.

Authors:  Nicholas K Sauter
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.616

5.  The impact of cryosolution thermal contraction on proteins and protein crystals: volumes, conformation and order.

Authors:  Douglas H Juers; Christopher A Farley; Christopher P Saxby; Rosemary A Cotter; Jackson K B Cahn; R Conor Holton-Burke; Kaitlin Harrison; Zhenguo Wu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 7.652

6.  Nanoscale mosaicity revealed in peptide microcrystals by scanning electron nanodiffraction.

Authors:  Marcus Gallagher-Jones; Colin Ophus; Karen C Bustillo; David R Boyer; Ouliana Panova; Calina Glynn; Chih-Te Zee; Jim Ciston; Kevin Canton Mancia; Andrew M Minor; Jose A Rodriguez
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-01-18

7.  A comparison of gas stream cooling and plunge cooling of macromolecular crystals.

Authors:  Kaitlin Harrison; Zhenguo Wu; Douglas H Juers
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.304

8.  Atomistic deformation mechanism of silicon under laser-driven shock compression.

Authors:  Silvia Pandolfi; S Brennan Brown; P G Stubley; Andrew Higginbotham; C A Bolme; H J Lee; B Nagler; E Galtier; R L Sandberg; W Yang; W L Mao; J S Wark; A E Gleason
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 17.694

9.  Beyond integration: modeling every pixel to obtain better structure factors from stills.

Authors:  Derek Mendez; Robert Bolotovsky; Asmit Bhowmick; Aaron S Brewster; Jan Kern; Junko Yano; James M Holton; Nicholas K Sauter
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.769

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.