Literature DB >> 10940042

Understanding the growth phenotype of the yeast gcr1 mutant in terms of global genomic expression patterns.

M C López1, H V Baker.   

Abstract

The phenotype of an organism is the manifestation of its expressed genome. The gcr1 mutant of yeast grows at near wild-type rates on nonfermentable carbon sources but exhibits a severe growth defect when grown in the presence of glucose, even when nonfermentable carbon sources are available. Using DNA microarrays, the genomic expression patterns of wild-type and gcr1 mutant yeast growing on various media, with and without glucose, were compared. A total of 53 open reading frames (ORFs) were identified as GCR1 dependent based on the criterion that their expression was reduced twofold or greater in mutant versus wild-type cultures grown in permissive medium consisting of YP supplemented with glycerol and lactate. The GCR1-dependent genes, so defined, fell into three classes: (i) glycolytic enzyme genes, (ii) ORFs carried by Ty elements, and (iii) genes not previously known to be GCR1 dependent. In wild-type cultures, GCR1-dependent genes accounted for 27% of the total hybridization signal, whereas in mutant cultures, they accounted for 6% of the total. Glucose addition to the growth medium resulted in a reprogramming of gene expression in both wild-type and mutant yeasts. In both strains, glycolytic enzyme gene expression was induced by the addition of glucose, although the expression of these genes was still impaired in the mutant compared to the wild type. By contrast, glucose resulted in a strong induction of Ty-borne genes in the mutant background but did not greatly affect their already high expression in the wild-type background. Both strains responded to glucose by repressing the expression of genes involved in respiration and the metabolism of alternative carbon sources. Thus, the severe growth inhibition observed in gcr1 mutants in the presence of glucose is the result of normal signal transduction pathways and glucose repression mechanisms operating without sufficient glycolytic enzyme gene expression to support growth via glycolysis alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10940042      PMCID: PMC111378          DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.17.4970-4978.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  55 in total

1.  Chromosomal landscape of nucleosome-dependent gene expression and silencing in yeast.

Authors:  J J Wyrick; F C Holstege; E G Jennings; H C Causton; D Shore; M Grunstein; E S Lander; R A Young
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-11-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Cooperation of glycolytic enzymes.

Authors:  B Hess; A Boiteux; J Krüger
Journal:  Adv Enzyme Regul       Date:  1969

3.  Purification and cloning of a DNA binding protein from yeast that binds to both silencer and activator elements.

Authors:  D Shore; K Nasmyth
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-12-04       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  The gcr (glycolysis regulation) mutation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  D Clifton; D G Fraenkel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1981-12-25       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Systematic changes in gene expression patterns following adaptive evolution in yeast.

Authors:  T L Ferea; D Botstein; P O Brown; R F Rosenzweig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Glycolytic gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: nucleotide sequence of GCR1, null mutants, and evidence for expression.

Authors:  H V Baker
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Efficient expression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PGK gene depends on an upstream activation sequence but does not require TATA sequences.

Authors:  J E Ogden; C Stanway; S Kim; J Mellor; A J Kingsman; S M Kingsman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Coordinate control of syntheses of ribosomal ribonucleic acid and ribosomal proteins during nutritional shift-up in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  D R Kief; J R Warner
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Isolation and identification of yeast messenger ribonucleic acids coding for enolase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and phosphoglycerate kinase.

Authors:  M J Holland; J P Holland
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1978-11-14       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Glycolysis mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  D Clifton; S B Weinstock; D G Fraenkel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  20 in total

1.  Rap1p requires Gcr1p and Gcr2p homodimers to activate ribosomal protein and glycolytic genes, respectively.

Authors:  S J Deminoff; G M Santangelo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Rap1p and other transcriptional regulators can function in defining distinct domains of gene expression.

Authors:  Qun Yu; Runxiang Qiu; Travis B Foland; Dan Griesen; Carl S Galloway; Ya-Hui Chiu; Joseph Sandmeier; James R Broach; Xin Bi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  A network of transcriptionally coordinated functional modules in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Allegra A Petti; George M Church
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  The expression of PHO92 is regulated by Gcr1, and Pho92 is involved in glucose metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Hyun-Jun Kang; Miwha Chang; Chang-Min Kang; Yong-Sung Park; Bong-June Yoon; Tae-Hyoung Kim; Cheol-Won Yun
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.886

5.  Transcriptional and proteomic analysis of a ferric uptake regulator (fur) mutant of Shewanella oneidensis: possible involvement of fur in energy metabolism, transcriptional regulation, and oxidative stress.

Authors:  Dorothea K Thompson; Alexander S Beliaev; Carol S Giometti; Sandra L Tollaksen; Tripti Khare; Douglas P Lies; Kenneth H Nealson; Hanjo Lim; John Yates; Craig C Brandt; James M Tiedje; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  The Ty1 LTR-retrotransposon of budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M Joan Curcio; Sheila Lutz; Pascale Lesage
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-04-01

7.  Posttranscriptional Regulation of Gcr1 Expression and Activity Is Crucial for Metabolic Adjustment in Response to Glucose Availability.

Authors:  Munshi Azad Hossain; Julia M Claggett; Samantha R Edwards; Aishan Shi; Sara L Pennebaker; Melodyanne Y Cheng; Jeff Hasty; Tracy L Johnson
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts.

Authors:  Stefan Hohmann
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 11.056

9.  Regulation of glycolysis in Kluyveromyces lactis: role of KlGCR1 and KlGCR2 in glucose uptake and catabolism.

Authors:  H Neil; M Lemaire; M Wésolowski-Louvel
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 3.886

10.  Remodeling yeast gene transcription by activating the Ty1 long terminal repeat retrotransposon under severe adenine deficiency.

Authors:  Géraldine Servant; Carole Pennetier; Pascale Lesage
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.