Literature DB >> 10938313

Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. II. Effects of stimulus intensity.

S R Williams1, C E Chapman.   

Abstract

This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of stimuli were detected at rest (1 x P(90)); four multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2. 0 x P(90)). At all intensities of stimulation, detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases occurring within +/-12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in the first dorsal interosseous (25-45 ms before movement onset). Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 x P(90)), magnitude estimation experiments were performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 x P(90) (5 subjects) and 3 x P(90) (3 subjects). Significant movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was then combined with a previous model that described the effects of stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement. Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of movement-related gating will have to fulfill.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10938313     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.2.863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  16 in total

1.  Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive contributions to perception of hand path rectilinearity during reaching.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Kyle P Lillis; Scott J Emerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology.

Authors:  Erich Schröger; Anna Marzecová; Iria SanMiguel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Multisensory enhancement: gains in choice and in simple response times.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A critical speed for gating of tactile detection during voluntary movement.

Authors:  Anita Cybulska-Klosowicz; El-Mehdi Meftah; Mélissa Raby; Marie-Line Lemieux; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Tactile suppression in goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Gordon Binsted; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

6.  Perceptual and decisional attenuation of tactile perception during the preparation of self- versus externally-generated movements.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Tactile perception during action observation.

Authors:  Roberta Vastano; Alberto Inuggi; Claudia D Vargas; Gabriel Baud-Bovy; Marco Jacono; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Tactile suppression of displacement.

Authors:  Mounia Ziat; Vincent Hayward; C Elaine Chapman; Marc O Ernst; Charles Lenay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Enhancement of response times to bi- and tri-modal sensory stimuli during active movements.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The Orofacial Somatosensory System Is Modulated During Speech Planning and Production.

Authors:  Brianna J McGuffin; Julie M Liss; Ayoub Daliri
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.