Literature DB >> 22848317

Hamstrings tendon graft preparation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the WhipKnot™ soft tissue cinch technique.

Amin Masoumiganjgah1, Umesh Dhanjee, Tendai Mwaturura, Cameron Carmody.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appropriate graft tension and secure graft incorporation in bone tunnels are essential for successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstrings tendon autografts. The WhipKnot™ soft tissue cinch, introduced by Smith and Nephew in 2004, is an alternative option to the commonly used whipstitch technique during preparation of the hamstring autograft in ACL reconstruction. AIMS: To investigate the effectiveness of the WhipKnot™ soft tissue cinch and technique during the preparation of the tendon graft for ACL reconstruction.
METHOD: A total of 33 ACL reconstruction operations performed between February 2011 and December 2011 were included in this study. These were performed by a single senior surgeon who used the Whipknot™ technique for the preparation of each graft. Four were used for each operation; two for each end of the harvested hamstrings tendons, including semitendinosus and gracilis tendons respectively.
RESULTS: In total, 132 WhipKnots were used during the knee operations. Use of the WhipKnot™ technique resulted in successful graft preparations, tensioning and effective graft placement in the tibial and femoral tunnels in almost all instances. Only one case of WhipKnot™ failure (slippage) was recorded.
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the Whipknot™ technique is a safe, reliable and practical option for the preparation of the hamstrings autografts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Whipknot™; graft preparation; reconstruction

Year:  2012        PMID: 22848317      PMCID: PMC3395278          DOI: 10.4066/AMJ.2012.1241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Med J        ISSN: 1836-1935


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II. Operative procedures and clinical correlations.

Authors:  F H Fu; C H Bennett; C B Ma; J Menetrey; C Lattermann
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Mechanical behavior of two hamstring graft constructs for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  J Höher; S U Scheffler; J D Withrow; G A Livesay; R E Debski; F H Fu; S L Woo
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  [Long-term outcome of conservative or surgical therapy of anterior cruciate ligament rupture].

Authors:  C Fink; C Hoser; K P Benedetto; W Hackl; M Gabl
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  A comparison of conservative and delayed surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. A matched pair analysis.

Authors:  R H Wittenberg; H U Oxfort; C Plafki
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Long-term results of replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament in comparison with conservative therapy].

Authors:  H Seitz; A Chrysopoulos; E Egkher; M Mousavi
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 0.955

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Suture Slippage During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Passage Is Significantly Lower Using a Krackow Suture.

Authors:  Tatsuo Mae; Kazunori Shimomura; Tomoki Ohori; Takehiko Hirose; Shuji Taketomi; Tomoyuki Suzuki; Ken Nakata
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.