Literature DB >> 10937232

Lifetime selection on adult body size and components of body size in a waterstrider: opposing selection and maintenance of sexual size dimorphism.

R F Preziosi1, D J Fairbairn.   

Abstract

Sexual size dimorphism (SSD), the difference in body size between males and females, is common in almost all taxa of animals and is generally assumed to be adaptive. Although sexual selection and fecundity selection alone have often been invoked to explain the evolution of SSD, more recent views indicate that the sexes must experience different lifetime selection pressures for SSD to evolve and be maintained. We estimated selection acting on male and female adult body size (total length) and components of body size in the waterstrider Aquarius remigis during three phases of life history. Opposing selection pressures for overall body size occurred in separate episodes of fitness for females in both years and for males in one year. Specific components of body size were often the targets of the selection on overall body size. When net adult fitness was estimated by combining each individual's fitnesses from all episodes, we found stabilizing selection in both sexes. In addition, the net optimum overall body size of males was smaller than that of females. However, even when components of body size had experienced opposing selection pressures in individual episodes, no components appeared to be under lifetime stabilizing selection. This is the first evidence that contemporary selection in a natural population acts to maintain female size larger than male size, the most common pattern of SSD in nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10937232     DOI: 10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0558:LSOABS]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  11 in total

Review 1.  Sex-biased gene expression and sexual conflict throughout development.

Authors:  Fiona C Ingleby; Ilona Flis; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Ecophysiological determinants of sexual size dimorphism: integrating growth trajectories, environmental conditions, and metabolic rates.

Authors:  Marie-Claire Chelini; John P Delong; Eileen A Hebets
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of resistance to Bt cotton on diapause in the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella.

Authors:  Yves Carrière; Christa Ellers-Kirk; Robert W Biggs; Maria A Sims; Timothy J Dennehy; Bruce E Tabashnik
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.857

4.  The sex-limited effects of mutations in the EGFR and TGF-β signaling pathways on shape and size sexual dimorphism and allometry in the Drosophila wing.

Authors:  Nicholas D Testa; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 5.  The genetic basis of traits regulating sperm competition and polyandry: can selection favour the evolution of good- and sexy-sperm?

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Size-assortative mating and sexual size dimorphism are predictable from simple mechanics of mate-grasping behavior.

Authors:  Chang S Han; Piotr G Jablonski; Beobkyun Kim; Frank C Park
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Evolutionary optimality in sex differences of longevity and athletic performances.

Authors:  Hiromi Asanuma; Satoshi Kakishima; Hiromu Ito; Kazuya Kobayashi; Eisuke Hasegawa; Takahiro Asami; Kenji Matsuura; Derek A Roff; Jin Yoshimura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Coevolution of female and male genital components to avoid genital size mismatches in sexually dimorphic spiders.

Authors:  Nik Lupše; Ren-Chung Cheng; Matjaž Kuntner
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Female-biased gape and body-size dimorphism in the New World watersnakes (tribe: Thamnophiini) oppose predictions from Rensch's rule.

Authors:  Frank T Burbrink; India Futterman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Sexual size dimorphism in anurans fails to obey Rensch's rule.

Authors:  Wen Bo Liao; Yu Zeng; Cai Quan Zhou; Robert Jehle
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.